Skip to content

Conversation

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member

This PR is built on top of PR #146 initially. Review of the PR for merging should take into consideration impact on the project release flow.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* #146

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
ajnelson-nist added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
This patch was distilled from PR 147.

References:
* #147

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 20:09
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

I think it will be helpful with review of a few recent proposals, as I'd noted on the 2025-12-02 OCs call. While this PR handles the Time proposal, hypothesis modeling and the Roles discussion logged in #155 would also benefit significantly from the extra testing abilities.

Copy link
Contributor

@vulnmaster vulnmaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed and approved.

@vulnmaster vulnmaster merged commit ea00e08 into master Dec 2, 2025
1 check passed
@vulnmaster vulnmaster deleted the existence_intervals_shapes_review branch December 2, 2025 21:52
ajnelson-nist added a commit to Cyber-Domain-Ontology/cdo.github.io that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

References:
* casework/CASE-Examples#147

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelsin <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
ajnelson-nist added a commit to Cyber-Domain-Ontology/cdo.github.io that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
References:
* casework/CASE-Examples#147

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelsin <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants