-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 97
Fix for the hydrate function and 0.22.1 release
#2091
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Can't put this commit on master. See: #2092 |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5836 | 10.14 | 3.20 | 0.51 |
| 2 | 6039 | 12.87 | 4.09 | 0.55 |
| 3 | 6236 | 14.47 | 4.57 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 6641 | 18.97 | 6.00 | 0.64 |
| 10 | 7644 | 29.09 | 9.17 | 0.79 |
| 43 | 14279 | 98.82 | 30.88 | 1.80 |
Commit transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
| UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 561 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
| 2 | 742 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
| 3 | 917 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
| 5 | 1276 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
| 10 | 2174 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
| 54 | 10070 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom transaction costs
| Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 | 524 | 24.46 | 7.13 | 0.42 |
| 2 | 114 | 636 | 33.25 | 9.61 | 0.52 |
| 3 | 170 | 747 | 41.20 | 11.92 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 228 | 858 | 48.25 | 14.02 | 0.68 |
| 5 | 285 | 974 | 56.36 | 16.36 | 0.77 |
| 6 | 338 | 1085 | 73.09 | 20.73 | 0.94 |
| 7 | 395 | 1192 | 72.97 | 21.15 | 0.94 |
| 8 | 450 | 1303 | 99.90 | 28.19 | 1.22 |
| 9 | 506 | 1414 | 90.61 | 26.11 | 1.13 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1795 | 23.78 | 7.94 | 0.48 |
| 2 | 2019 | 26.19 | 9.45 | 0.52 |
| 3 | 2068 | 26.72 | 10.20 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 2395 | 31.08 | 12.96 | 0.60 |
| 10 | 3023 | 38.80 | 18.70 | 0.73 |
| 42 | 7883 | 99.30 | 59.89 | 1.73 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 622 | 22.50 | 7.27 | 0.41 |
| 2 | 785 | 25.36 | 8.73 | 0.45 |
| 3 | 945 | 26.09 | 9.58 | 0.47 |
| 5 | 1303 | 32.10 | 12.61 | 0.56 |
| 10 | 1969 | 40.33 | 18.23 | 0.69 |
| 42 | 6641 | 98.19 | 55.64 | 1.64 |
Close transaction costs
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 659 | 28.99 | 9.24 | 0.48 |
| 2 | 836 | 29.03 | 10.00 | 0.49 |
| 3 | 902 | 32.55 | 11.67 | 0.54 |
| 5 | 1176 | 36.02 | 14.08 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 2090 | 45.13 | 20.74 | 0.76 |
| 36 | 5978 | 95.47 | 54.57 | 1.58 |
Contest transaction costs
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 678 | 33.73 | 10.50 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 768 | 35.02 | 11.47 | 0.55 |
| 3 | 942 | 37.62 | 13.03 | 0.59 |
| 5 | 1341 | 43.66 | 16.49 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 2057 | 53.48 | 22.86 | 0.84 |
| 29 | 4810 | 96.69 | 49.10 | 1.50 |
Abort transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
| Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5779 | 27.04 | 9.05 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 5948 | 36.73 | 12.33 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 6026 | 44.48 | 14.90 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 6186 | 54.92 | 18.41 | 1.00 |
| 5 | 6358 | 65.32 | 21.89 | 1.12 |
| 6 | 6491 | 73.70 | 24.71 | 1.21 |
| 7 | 6726 | 85.31 | 28.79 | 1.34 |
| 8 | 6813 | 94.01 | 31.78 | 1.44 |
FanOut transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
| Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 1 | 57 | 5868 | 21.23 | 7.22 | 0.63 |
| 10 | 5 | 285 | 6004 | 29.80 | 10.58 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 10 | 569 | 6174 | 39.27 | 14.37 | 0.84 |
| 10 | 20 | 1139 | 6513 | 60.46 | 22.69 | 1.09 |
| 10 | 30 | 1707 | 6853 | 81.41 | 30.92 | 1.33 |
| 10 | 39 | 2219 | 7158 | 98.11 | 37.59 | 1.53 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-06-27 14:33:05.62171876 UTC
Baseline Scenario
| Number of nodes | 1 |
|---|---|
| Number of txs | 300 |
| Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.313699016 |
| P99 | 5.8977423599999925ms |
| P95 | 5.04442325ms |
| P50 | 4.1934735ms |
| Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
| Time | Used | Free |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-27 14:31:50.214109914 UTC | 0m | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:31:55.213948486 UTC | 8 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:00.213898708 UTC | 6 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:05.213939851 UTC | 1 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:10.213863253 UTC | 1 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:15.213855916 UTC | 1 | 0; |
Three local nodes
| Number of nodes | 3 |
|---|---|
| Number of txs | 900 |
| Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 29.975068542 |
| P99 | 58.350397269999995ms |
| P95 | 46.77941479999999ms |
| P50 | 27.388838999999997ms |
| Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
| Time | Used | Free |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-27 14:32:28.500280111 UTC | 0m | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:33.500950269 UTC | 8 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:38.501330665 UTC | 5 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:43.500285534 UTC | 23 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:48.5003181 UTC | 14 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:53.500275487 UTC | 2 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:32:58.500416958 UTC | 2 | 0; |
| 2025-06-27 14:33:03.500370743 UTC | 2 | 0; |
Transaction cost differencesNo cost or size differences found |
This is a small patch release (+ the code itself) to fix the
ReplayingStatestalling bug that was being observed.There is some follow-up work to be done in #2086 ; but this never-the-less represents an improvement.
Fixes #2089