Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: bump microk8s 1.25 -> 1.29 #239

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

ci: bump microk8s 1.25 -> 1.29 #239

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas commented Jun 17, 2024

@DnPlas DnPlas requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2024 23:20
Copy link
Member

@misohu misohu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI fails with

juju.errors.JujuError: ['Charm feature requirements cannot be met:\n  - charm requires at least one of the following:\n    - charm requires all of the following:\n      - charm requires feature "juju" (version < 3.0.0) but model currently supports version 3.1.8\n    - charm requires all of the following:\n      - charm requires feature "juju" (version >= 3.4.3) but model currently supports version 3.1.8\n    - charm requires all of the following:\n      - charm requires feature "juju" (version >= 3.5.2) but model currently supports version 3.1.8\n\nFeature descriptions:\n  - "juju": the version of Juju used by the model\n\nFor additional information please see: https://juju.is/docs/olm/supported-features']

on mysql deployment. We are still using juju 3.1 in integraiton test we should bump this too to 3.5 I guess

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 18, 2024

I have submitted #240 to change the juju version. Let's merge after that.

@DnPlas DnPlas merged commit 96a1db7 into main Jun 21, 2024
8 checks passed
@DnPlas DnPlas deleted the KF-5733-bump-microk8s-1.29 branch June 21, 2024 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants