Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test diagrame first scope #228

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Mar 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

pierre-yves-monnet
Copy link
Contributor

Camunda Community Hub Pull Request Template

Test game for the migration
Different test game + automaton API to creates data in a C7 engine, ready to be migrate

Description

Differentes test games, to cover all main use case to migrate a C7 server to a C8 server.
Each test game contains

  • a description
  • the BPMN process
  • an Automator-process scenario, to produce process instances in the expected activity

Additional context

Testing your changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an existing open issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to an extension)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality of an extension to change)
  • Documentation update (changes made to an existing piece of documentation)

Checklist:

  • My code adheres to the syntax used by this extension.
  • My pull request requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the Camunda Community Hub documentation.
  • I have read the Pull Request Process documentation.
  • I have added or suggested tests to cover my changes suggested in this pull request.
  • All new and existing CI/CD tests passed.
  • I will /assign myself this issue, and add the relevant [issue labels] to it if they are not automatically generated by Probot.
  • I will tag @camunda-community-hub/devrel in a new comment on this issue if 30 days have passed since my pull request was opened and I have not received a response from the extension's maintainer.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jonathanlukas jonathanlukas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some things to change (mostly headers that are wrong)

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Merging Inclusive
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the diagram, the title should be Merging Parallel?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this is an Inclusive gateway here in the diagram ( ? )
image

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I just looked at the png, and there is a parallel gateway on merging:

image

@jonathanlukas jonathanlukas self-requested a review March 10, 2023 08:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@jonathanlukas jonathanlukas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The png in merging inclusive needs to be renewed

@pierre-yves-monnet pierre-yves-monnet merged commit df025ae into main Mar 17, 2023
@pierre-yves-monnet pierre-yves-monnet deleted the test_diagrame_first_scope branch March 17, 2023 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants