-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Improve test-definitions regarding style, structure and format #331
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve test-definitions regarding style, structure and format #331
Conversation
… location-retrieval.feature & location-verification.feature
bigludo7
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
jlurien
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some comments, still need to fully review geofencing-subscriptions
|
Geofencing test plan should be aligned with the outcome of camaraproject/Commonalities#470. |
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
|
@maxl2287 I would keep this open until camaraproject/Commonalities#470 is merged and then review that is totally aligned, wdyt? |
…definitions # Conflicts: # code/Test_definitions/geofencing-subscriptions.feature # code/Test_definitions/location-retrieval.feature
jlurien
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that geofencing-subscriptiuons.feature is not aligned yet with https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/blob/main/artifacts/camara-cloudevents/event-subscription-template.feature
…definitions # Conflicts: # code/Test_definitions/geofencing-subscriptions.feature # code/Test_definitions/location-retrieval.feature # code/Test_definitions/location-verification.feature
jlurien
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review that stabdar error scenarios are aligned with https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/blob/main/artifacts/camara-cloudevents/event-subscription-template.feature
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Luis Urien <jlurien@gmail.com>
bigludo7
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks Max
jlurien
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with 3 corrections that I can apply directly
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Improve test-definitions for geofencing-subscriptions.feature, location-retrieval.feature & location-verification.feature
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #330
Changelog input