Description
Context
Currently, the requireNodeAddon()
function requires only 1 string argument, which was expected to be a relative path to the compiled Node add-on. This worked great for the first few simple PoCs and demos, but it start showing its age and limitations already. In the meantime @kraenhansen in #12 added support for hashing the module paths to solve the issues of name clashes when modules are being packaged, which was later replaced by #32.
Problem statement
- The current solution does not support addons, which are imported by specifying just the package name, whose
package.json
specifies themain
field. - Leaking abstraction (exposes implementation details)
Proposed solution
Adding additional parameters to requireNodeAddon()
that would enable the platform's add-on loader to resolve the path and try a few of them. My current suggestion is to have requireNodeAddon(requiredPath: string, targetPackageName: string, fromSubpath: string)
where:
requiredPath
is (in most cases) the original relative path passed to therequire()
call. If this path was not relative (starting with.
or..
) then it should be the package name which will be resolved by looking up themain
field, making this argument a relative subpath again.packageName
should be the name of the package that this add-on is expected to be in. Please note that such package name might be scoped, therefore - for simplicity - I've decided to keep it separated from the subpath.fromSubpath
is the relative path (subpath) of the file that issued the call to therequire()
function. This parameter is needed to resolve the package-relative path where the add-on is supposed to be.
Example use case 1
Somebody in ./src/index.js
within package @callstack/foo
wrote:
const module = require('./build/Release/foo.node');
Our Babel plugin should replace it with following:
const module = requireNodeAddon('./build/Release/foo.node', '@callstack/foo', './src/index.js');
In this case, the native loader would be able to resolve the relative path by combining ./build/Release/foo.node
on top of ./src/index.js
, resulting in ./src/build/Release/foo.node
- which should be added to the search paths.
Note
If the path would include the package name (especially when it's scoped), like @callstack/foo/src/build/Release/foo.node
, then separating the package name from the subpath would be a little bit more convoluted (we would need to parse it). Passing those as separate arguments gives us those "for free".
Example use-case 2
Somebody in the package @callstack/foo
set the main
field in their package.json
to ./foo.node
. A different user in their package (say whatever
) writes:
const { foofighter } = require('@callstack/foo');
then our Babel plugin should output:
const { foofighter } = requireNodeAddon('./foo.node', '@callstack/foo', './package.json');
Following the steps from the "algorithm" above, the relative path would be resolved to ./foo.node
(it used the path from main
and ./package.json
gives ./
), which will be expected to be in the @callstack/foo
package. The exact value of the last argument is not that important here (can be ./
or .
as well).
Example use-case 3
Somebody in ./src/wrapper.js
that's part of package foo
wrote:
const fs = require('node:fs');
Our Babel plugin is expected to output this instead:
const fs = requireNodeAddon('node:fs', 'foo', './src/wrapper.js');
More flexible loader
One of the main goals of this proposal would be to "hide" the resolution algorithm in native code. The JavaScript side should not care whether the names are hashed or changed in any other way. The closer the original Node.js code, the better. Those 3 separate arguments: requiredPath
, targetPackageName
and fromSubpath
gives more flexibility to the native loader. If all the addons are flattened into a single directory (like for iOS), the JS does not care -- the native loader will be able to implement this logic and try different search paths and variants.
Lastly, it shouldn't be hard to adapt this approach to support ES modules that use import
and export
.