Removes the getUser logic from createContext, instead use isAuthed #7902
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📦 Next.js Bundle AnalysisThis analysis was generated by the next.js bundle analysis action 🤖 Two Pages Changed SizeThe following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:
DetailsOnly the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip. First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the The "Budget %" column shows what percentage of your performance budget the First Load total takes up. For example, if your budget was 100kb, and a given page's first load size was 10kb, it would be 10% of your budget. You can also see how much this has increased or decreased compared to the base branch of your PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this. If you see "+/- <0.01%" it means that there was a change in bundle size, but it is a trivial enough amount that it can be ignored. |
|
No failed tests 🎉 |
| export const router = t.router; | ||
| export const mergeRouters = t.mergeRouters; | ||
| export const middleware = t.middleware; | ||
| export const publicProcedure = t.procedure.use(perfMiddleware); | ||
| export const authedProcedure = t.procedure.use(perfMiddleware).use(isAuthedMiddleware); | ||
| export const authedRateLimitedProcedure = ({ intervalInMs, limit }: IRateLimitOptions) => |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking in the code it's unused and also we can (and should) handle this on the middleware level of Vercel 👍 - just too low to be effective at rate limiting at this point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is used in the upcoming #6511 although we should come up with a proper replacement first.
What does this PR do?
Intended to speed up unprotected routes when a session is available.