-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: remove 2 steps from the onboarding flow for google signups #17787
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 2 Skipped Deployments
|
Graphite Automations"Add consumer team as reviewer" took an action on this PR • (11/21/24)1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation. |
E2E results are ready! |
stepLabel: (currentStep: number, totalSteps: number) => `Test Step ${currentStep} of ${totalSteps}`, | ||
disableNavigation: undefined, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixes type error that existed in this test file
Pull request was converted to draft
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
const EXTRA_STEPS = ["connected-calendar", "connected-video"] as const; | ||
type StepType = (typeof BASE_STEPS)[number] | (typeof EXTRA_STEPS)[number]; | ||
|
||
const getStepsAndHeadersForUser = (identityProvider: IdentityProvider, t: TFunction) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: this looks like a hook, instead of a function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, will address this in a separate PR!
}); | ||
testOnboarding(IdentityProvider.GOOGLE); | ||
testOnboarding(IdentityProvider.CAL); | ||
testOnboarding(IdentityProvider.SAML); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
q: do we need to await Promise.all? or no need?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good Q, let me play with it
What does this PR do?
Mandatory Tasks (DO NOT REMOVE)
How should this be tested?