Skip to content

Upgrade dependencies to fix test failures on JDK 11. #738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019

Conversation

sundbp
Copy link
Contributor

@sundbp sundbp commented Feb 13, 2019

Description

The toArray method is now overloaded and requires type hints, and through
transitive depencies the boot-alt-test dependency dragged in an old version of
core.rrb-vector breakin the build on jdk11+.

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

The toArray method is now overloaded and requires type hints, and through
transitive depencies the boot-alt-test dependency dragged in an old version of
core.rrb-vector breakin the build on jdk11.
@bbatsov
Copy link
Contributor

bbatsov commented Mar 20, 2019

I guess you should rebase on top of master.

@bbatsov bbatsov mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2019
@sundbp
Copy link
Contributor Author

sundbp commented Mar 20, 2019

done - the failure now is because the travis run for jdk12 doesn't manage to install a JDK. unrelated to this issue (and we see it passes on 11 and 13 so v likely to be fine on 12 as well).

@burn2delete burn2delete merged commit 5fe5ddd into boot-clj:master Mar 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants