Skip to content

Private named static fields #33

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

mheiber
Copy link

@mheiber mheiber commented Mar 27, 2019

1 meaningful commit, so please check the diff there
Builds on #19
which builds on #32

The emit seems like it might be right, even though all I did was update the code related to emitting private names for fields so that it doesn't pay attention to whether the field is static or not.

@mheiber mheiber changed the title Private named static fields WIP Private named static fields Mar 27, 2019
Max Heiber and others added 2 commits April 9, 2019 14:38
Transform private-named instance methods

Signed-off-by: Max Heiber <max.heiber@gmail.com>
Implement transformation for private-named
fields. This turned out to be as easy as
ignoring whether a private-named field is
static or not.

Signed-off-by: Max Heiber <max.heiber@gmail.com>
@mheiber mheiber force-pushed the private-named-static-fields branch from 21e2f6a to bdc8a55 Compare April 9, 2019 14:13
@mheiber mheiber changed the base branch from master to es-private-fields April 9, 2019 14:13
@mheiber mheiber changed the base branch from es-private-fields to private-named-instance-fields April 9, 2019 14:14
@mheiber mheiber changed the base branch from private-named-instance-fields to es-private-fields April 9, 2019 14:15
@mheiber mheiber changed the title WIP Private named static fields Private named static fields Apr 9, 2019
@mheiber mheiber closed this Sep 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant