Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DevOps as workflow code owners #3105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2023
Merged

Add DevOps as workflow code owners #3105

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2023

Conversation

withinfocus
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] New feature development
- [ ] Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc)
- [X] Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps)
- [ ] Other

Objective

Per our template use DevOps as code owners for Actions workflows. This will at a minimum get us eyes on updates.

Code changes

  • .github/CODEOWNERS: DevOps for workflows.

Before you submit

  • Please check for formatting errors (dotnet format --verify-no-changes) (required)
  • If making database changes - make sure you also update Entity Framework queries and/or migrations
  • Please add unit tests where it makes sense to do so (encouraged but not required)
  • If this change requires a documentation update - notify the documentation team
  • If this change has particular deployment requirements - notify the DevOps team

@withinfocus withinfocus requested a review from a team July 14, 2023 14:16
@withinfocus withinfocus enabled auto-merge (squash) July 14, 2023 14:17
@withinfocus withinfocus merged commit 966614c into master Jul 14, 2023
4 checks passed
@withinfocus withinfocus deleted the devopscode branch July 14, 2023 14:17
@bitwarden-bot
Copy link

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsa6fd085e-0ee4-48a5-aaca-237bc8250e1b

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants