Add opt out docs link to the bws changelog

[coltonhurst]

📔 Objective

As discussed in PR #1122, add a link to our docs about the opt out change.

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
  team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 533cdf65-6a8d-4797-b9fc-155376069a1a

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.17%. Comparing base (8aea2e9) to head (72b343f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1142   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.17%   58.17%           
=======================================
  Files         197      197           
  Lines       13587    13587           
=======================================
  Hits         7904     7904           
  Misses       5683     5683           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dani-garcia]

Changes here LGTM.

I think it would be nice to also include a short mention of what state is used for in the docs, though. At the moment we don't explain it's use so it's hard to decide if you want to opt out or not.

[coltonhurst]

Changes here LGTM.

I think it would be nice to also include a short mention of what state is used for in the docs, though. At the moment we don't explain it's use so it's hard to decide if you want to opt out or not.

Thanks! Great suggestion. I've submitted a request to the docs team.