Skip to content

Conversation

@david-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator

@david-livefront david-livefront commented Dec 17, 2025

🎟️ Tracking

PM-29912

📔 Objective

This PR Moves as much logic as possible into a central location and exposes it via the app-specific SettingsRepositorys.

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

) : BaseDiskSource(sharedPreferences = sharedPreferences),
SettingsDiskSource {
SettingsDiskSource,
FlightRecorderDiskSource by flightRecorderDiskSource {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@david-livefront david-livefront Dec 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am a little torn with this.

On one hand, this centralizes a decent bit of logic but it is a bit cumbersome in the these places.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with Claude. The trade-off here is worth it. 🚀

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Claude finished @david-livefront's task in 4m 2s —— View job


Code Review Summary

Status: ✅ Approved with minor suggestion

This PR successfully extracts flight recorder disk operations into a dedicated FlightRecorderDiskSource implementation, improving code organization and reusability across both app and authenticator modules.

Overview

Change Type: Refactoring
Risk Level: Low
Test Coverage: Comprehensive

Key Changes

  1. New FlightRecorderDiskSource interface and implementation - Centralizes flight recorder persistence logic in the data module
  2. Delegation pattern - Both SettingsDiskSourceImpl classes now delegate to FlightRecorderDiskSource for flight recorder operations
  3. Dependency injection updates - Proper DI wiring in both app and authenticator modules, including transitive dependencies (BuildInfoManager, DownloadService)
  4. Test infrastructure - New FlightRecorderDiskSourceTest and FakeFlightRecorderDiskSource for proper test coverage
  5. Removed factory method - FlightRecorderManager.create() replaced with direct DI construction

Architecture Assessment

Separation of concerns - Flight recorder logic properly isolated
Delegation pattern - Correctly applied using Kotlin's by keyword
Module boundaries - Clean dependency flow: app/authenticator → data
DI setup - All dependencies properly wired through Hilt
Test coverage - Comprehensive unit tests maintained

Findings

🎨 Suggested (1)

  • Typo in test name - isFLightRecorderEnabled should be isFlightRecorderEnabled (uppercase L)

Review Complete

This is a clean refactoring that improves maintainability without introducing functional changes. The delegation pattern is well-applied, dependencies are correctly wired, and test coverage is maintained. The single finding is a minor typo that doesn't affect functionality.


🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 noreply@anthropic.com

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details536e57cf-f355-4ac2-923a-22e34d45fe3f

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@david-livefront david-livefront force-pushed the PM-29912-flight-recorder-disk-source branch 3 times, most recently from d0a1aca to 2394949 Compare January 2, 2026 17:21
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.52%. Comparing base (5245a7a) to head (7a17b9f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6281      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.45%   85.52%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         776      763      -13     
  Lines       54949    54621     -328     
  Branches     7854     7852       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        46957    46712     -245     
+ Misses       5264     5181      -83     
  Partials     2728     2728              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@david-livefront david-livefront force-pushed the PM-29912-flight-recorder-disk-source branch from 2394949 to 83f6dc6 Compare January 5, 2026 18:19
@SaintPatrck SaintPatrck added the ai-review Request a Claude code review label Jan 7, 2026
SaintPatrck
SaintPatrck previously approved these changes Jan 7, 2026
@david-livefront david-livefront force-pushed the PM-29912-flight-recorder-disk-source branch from 83f6dc6 to 4adf00a Compare January 7, 2026 18:10
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ai-review Request a Claude code review label Jan 7, 2026
@david-livefront david-livefront force-pushed the PM-29912-flight-recorder-disk-source branch from 4adf00a to 7a17b9f Compare January 7, 2026 19:05
@david-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @SaintPatrck

@david-livefront david-livefront added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 7, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit c4a94cf Jan 7, 2026
16 checks passed
@david-livefront david-livefront deleted the PM-29912-flight-recorder-disk-source branch January 7, 2026 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants