Skip to content

Conversation

@david-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator

🎟️ Tracking

N/A

📔 Objective

This PR is intended to improve clarity of the Autofill ViewNode traversal logic without making any functional changes.

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Claude finished @david-livefront's task —— View job


Review Summary

Overall Assessment: APPROVE

This refactoring successfully improves code clarity without functional changes.


var idPackage: String? = this.idPackage
// OS sometimes defaults node.idPackage to "android", which is not a valid
// package name so it is ignored to prevent auto-filling unknown applications.
var storedIdPackage: String? = this.idPackage?.takeUnless { it.isBlank() || it == "android" }
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have lifted the blank and android check here to simplify the logic below. Additionally I have renamed the local idPackage to storedIdPackage so that it does not conflict with the property on the ViewNode.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details1112f4d0-c1d7-49ca-9f2c-c4587061c96a

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@david-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @SaintPatrck

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.36364% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.97%. Comparing base (9baec6e) to head (cb80473).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...bitwarden/data/autofill/util/ViewNodeExtensions.kt 88.88% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...twarden/data/autofill/parser/AutofillParserImpl.kt 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6138   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.97%   84.97%           
=======================================
  Files         723      723           
  Lines       52746    52740    -6     
  Branches     7649     7649           
=======================================
- Hits        44822    44817    -5     
+ Misses       5250     5249    -1     
  Partials     2674     2674           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@david-livefront david-livefront added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1024f77 Nov 7, 2025
15 of 18 checks passed
@david-livefront david-livefront deleted the improve-autofill-clarity branch November 7, 2025 18:39
dev-sharma3624 pushed a commit to dev-sharma3624/android that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants