-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 927
Clarify package id parsing and AutofillView creation #6138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @david-livefront's task —— View job Review SummaryOverall Assessment: APPROVE This refactoring successfully improves code clarity without functional changes. |
| var idPackage: String? = this.idPackage | ||
| // OS sometimes defaults node.idPackage to "android", which is not a valid | ||
| // package name so it is ignored to prevent auto-filling unknown applications. | ||
| var storedIdPackage: String? = this.idPackage?.takeUnless { it.isBlank() || it == "android" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have lifted the blank and android check here to simplify the logic below. Additionally I have renamed the local idPackage to storedIdPackage so that it does not conflict with the property on the ViewNode.
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request |
|
Thanks @SaintPatrck |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6138 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.97% 84.97%
=======================================
Files 723 723
Lines 52746 52740 -6
Branches 7649 7649
=======================================
- Hits 44822 44817 -5
+ Misses 5250 5249 -1
Partials 2674 2674 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|

🎟️ Tracking
N/A
📔 Objective
This PR is intended to improve clarity of the Autofill ViewNode traversal logic without making any functional changes.
⏰ Reminders before review
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:) or similar for great changes:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info:question:) for questions:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion:art:) for suggestions / improvements:x:) or:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes