Update SDK to 1.0.0-3194-9947387b

[bw-ghapp]

Updates the SDK version from 1.0.0-3175-c9758478 to com.bitwarden:sdk-android 1.0.0-3194-9947387b

What's Changed

• Expose ClientManagedTokens to mobile sdk-internal#470

Raw changelog

- Expose ClientManagedTokens to mobile (#470)

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 44a8e193-ad12-4b20-be49-3c7d72c91f0f

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.40%. Comparing base (116bfd6) to head (d9fa708).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ator/data/platform/manager/SdkClientManagerImpl.kt	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...rden/data/platform/manager/SdkClientManagerImpl.kt	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5938      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.41%   84.40%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         719      719              
  Lines       54782    54789       +7     
  Branches     7530     7530              
==========================================
  Hits        46244    46244              
- Misses       5897     5904       +7     
  Partials     2641     2641              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[SaintPatrck]

I think it makes sense for AuthTokenManager to inherit ClientManagedTokens. That should make it easier to inject into SdkClientManagerImpl.

If we're only making a stubbed implementation for now, can we add a TODO comment and reference the associated ticket?

[david-livefront]

We can't do that unless we want the network module to depend on the SDK, which is something I'd like to avoid.

I have some WIP locally to bridge the gap between the network layer and the SDK layer.

[LRNcardozoWDF]

@SaintPatrck @david-livefront Do I leave it like this? Or do I add the TODO so we can revisit this later?

[SaintPatrck]

@LRNcardozoWDF you can leave it as-is. @david-livefront already has a PR with his changes. 🥳

[SaintPatrck]

Since the actual implementation will always return null for Authenticator, we can define this as a private inner class of SdkClientManagerImpl if we can't pass null for tokenProvider.