Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redefine cipher "share" to "move to organization" #1433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

MGibson1
Copy link
Member

Overview

The term "Share" is confusing to users because it implies maintaining ownership and control of a cipher while allowing others to access it as well. It also implies the ability to revoke access or to stop sharing -- neither of these things is true.

In addition to the share term being misleading, the fa-share-alt icon implies a forking of the cipher item rather than transferring ownership.

When a cipher is "shared" it is irrevocably taken over by an organization. This occurs for good cryptographic and security reasons. The better solution to this is to revise the communication around "sharing." To that end, this work changes the term "share" to "move to organization" and the icon is changed to fa-cube, which is used to indicate a collection. The act of moving an item to an organization is denoted by fa-arrow-circle-o-right rather than fa-share-alt.

Screen shots

Item View Options

image

image

Item Edit Options

image

image

Move To Organization View

image

image

Move To Organization Toast

image

image

Item hint part of Organization

image

image

@MGibson1 MGibson1 requested a review from a team June 17, 2021 20:51
@@ -1390,11 +1397,14 @@
<data name="ShareItem" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Share Item</value>
</data>
<data name="MoveToOrganization" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Move to Organization</value>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This title is really snug in a few of those iOS screenshots, and will probably exceed the available width in some translated versions. That being said, I can't come up with a shorter way to convey 'move to organization' unless we start using 'Org' everywhere which isn't great. Any thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The other verb I pitched was Transfer. This might be a good reason to use it.

That being said. These images were taken using an ipod touch. Even on the 8, there's quite a bit more room:
image

Copy link
Contributor

@mpbw2 mpbw2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, let's roll with it

@MGibson1 MGibson1 merged commit 2003ac9 into master Jun 18, 2021
@MGibson1 MGibson1 deleted the change-share-term branch June 18, 2021 11:52
MGibson1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
MGibson1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
MGibson1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2021
MGibson1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2021
…1459)

* Revert "Revert "Redefine cipher "share" to "move to organization" (#1433)" (#1440)"

This reverts commit bd4a275.

* Cancel > close
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants