BSIP 86: Share market fees to the network

[abitmore]

PR for #194.

[MichelSantos]

The discussion is very good

My personal suggestion, which should be considered completely optional, is to consider adding a discussion point that says that the committee will be accumulating tokens which could potentially be used or not used for any purpose. In other words, this BSIP as currently written does not stipulate how those tokens will or will not be used by the committee.

[bitcrab]

I agree that a BSIP should be as small as possible, this BSIP just provide a tool for system to charge UIA, there are works to do after the implementation of this BSIP - committee need to decide the parameter value and how to spend the accumulated fees. however in my view the current BSIP version is ready enough for development.

[MichelSantos]

I conclude that the proposal is technically complete

[sschiessl-bcp]

@abitmore your review completed?

[abitmore]

@sschiessl-bcp: yes, I think so.

[sschiessl-bcp]

Status set to accepted. Merge at your own convenience

[shulthz]

I suggest to pause this BSIP until solved the legal risk.

This BSIP must make a statement for this kind lawsuit，how to deal? who will be responsible for these lawsuit?
This BSIP must make a statement for this kind lawsuit to BTS holders.

This BSIP86 has legal risk, i suggest everyone need to consider it very carefully and seek a legal consultancy.

When BSIP86 charges the market fees from the GATEWAY.assets, the BTS system will have joint liability and must be responsible for these GATEWAY.assets, but these GATEWAY.assets were without supervision and control by the BTS system.

Gateway just likes the DApp of BTS, BTS just provides the service and takes the transaction fee of blockchain，DApp do what is not the business of BTS, but when BTS charges the market fees of GATEWAY.assets, the nature of things will become different.

[sschiessl-bcp]

I suggest to pause this BSIP until solved the legal risk.

This BSIP must make a statement for this kind lawsuit，how to deal? who will be responsible for these lawsuit?
This BSIP must make a statement for this kind lawsuit to BTS holders.

This BSIP86 has legal risk, i suggest everyone need to consider it very carefully and seek a legal consultancy.

When BSIP86 charges the market fees from the GATEWAY.assets, the BTS system will have joint liability and must be responsible for these GATEWAY.assets, but these GATEWAY.assets were without supervision and control by the BTS system.

Gateway just likes the DApp of BTS, BTS just provides the service and takes the transaction fee of blockchain，DApp do what is not the business of BTS, but when BTS charges the market fees of GATEWAY.assets, the nature of things will become different.

The BSIP creates the technical framework. Without any active action, nothing will be activated. That will need to be done by committee setting the fee. Please direct your efforts towards committee members and make them aware.

[shulthz]

The BSIP creates the technical framework. Without any active action, nothing will be activated. That will need to be done by committee setting the fee. Please direct your efforts towards committee members and make them aware.

Yes, it is a technical framework, but it didn't indicate it has legal risk clearly in the MD, it makes a trap to bts holders and committee.

Committees have staff changes, at last, the bts holders will face the lawsuit.

Even it is a technical framework, but it must make a statement for so clearly legal risk to bts holders, let the bts holders clearly know what they will face in the future.