BSIP73: Match force-settlement orders with margin calls and limit orders

[abitmore]

PR for #181.

[jmjatlanta]

Sorry, my "pedantic" mode was left on. The document is readable without any of the grammar changes I propose. Technically, this BSIP provides a clear picture of what is desired. Thanks!

I would happily mark this "approved" as-is, but would like to give others some time to review it.

[pmconrad]

Thanks.
FTR, my approval only means that I think this BSIP meets formal requirements. I still think it does not add sufficient value to justify the cost (performance impact, more complicated market engine, implementation cost).

[abitmore]

Thank you @pmconrad. The "Summary for Shareholders" section is still "TBD", I hope someone can help.

[pmconrad]

Suggested summary:

---

When force-settling a SmartCoin, the user currently has to wait for the settlement delay before his tokens are exchanged for the collateral asset. This BSIP introduces a new flag that allows settlement requests to be matched with market orders during the waiting period, potentially resulting in faster settlement and a better price.

[abitmore]

@pmconrad thanks. Please review again.

[sschiessl-bcp]

FTR, my approval only means that I think this BSIP meets formal requirements. I still think it does not add sufficient value to justify the cost (performance impact, more complicated market engine, implementation cost).

Should this be incorporated in the summary, or do we rather not burden the voters with this technical aspect?

[abitmore]

FTR, my approval only means that I think this BSIP meets formal requirements. I still think it does not add sufficient value to justify the cost (performance impact, more complicated market engine, implementation cost).

Should this be incorporated in the summary, or do we rather not burden the voters with this technical aspect?

Create a PR please? Thanks. I'll do it.