Skip to content

Conversation

@msynk
Copy link
Member

@msynk msynk commented May 31, 2025

closes #10883

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new customization options to text fields, including accent color, background color, border color, and a full-width display setting.
    • Introduced new demo examples showcasing the usage of these customization options and right-to-left layout support.
  • Style

    • Updated text field styling to use CSS variables for easier theming and customization.
    • Renamed and added CSS classes for improved consistency and full-width support.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded demo documentation with new examples and detailed parameter descriptions for enhanced guidance.

@msynk msynk requested review from Cyrus-Sushiant and ysmoradi May 31, 2025 10:53
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 31, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The BitTextField component is enhanced with new parameters—Accent, Background, Border, and FullWidth—for extended styling and layout flexibility. Corresponding CSS classes and variables are introduced to support these options. Demo examples are reorganized and expanded to showcase the new features, including additional color and layout demonstrations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor Renamed CSS classes for password reveal button and icon elements for consistency.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor.cs Added Accent, Background, Border, and FullWidth parameters; updated CSS class registration logic to support these new parameters.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.scss Replaced hardcoded color variables with CSS custom properties; added new utility and theme classes; renamed several classes for consistency; added full-width utility class.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor Removed old style/class demo; reorganized and added new examples for validation, background, border, accent, style/class, and RTL; updated code references and IDs.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor.cs Added new parameters and enums for Accent, Background, Border, FullWidth; added and updated example code snippets and enum definitions; removed outdated examples.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant BitTextField
    participant CSS

    User->>BitTextField: Set Accent, Background, Border, FullWidth parameters
    BitTextField->>BitTextField: Register corresponding CSS classes
    BitTextField->>CSS: Apply theme and utility classes
    CSS-->>BitTextField: Render styled component
    BitTextField-->>User: Display with specified styles and width
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Add FullWidth parameter to BitTextField (#10883)
Add Accent parameter to BitTextField (#10883)
Add Background color parameter to BitTextField (#10883)
Add Border color parameter to BitTextField (#10883)

Poem

🐇
New colors and widths, oh what a delight!
BitTextField shines, styled just right.
Accent and border, backgrounds anew,
Full width stretches—demo dreams come true!
With every new class, the UI’s more bright,
A rabbit’s proud hop for this stylish rewrite!
🌈


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor.cs (2)

261-301: Verify default color handling and consider consolidation.

The CSS class registrations look mostly correct, but there are a few considerations:

  1. Default values: All switch expressions fall back to a default (Primary), but this might override user intentions when parameters are null.
  2. Code duplication: The switch patterns are similar and could potentially be consolidated.

Consider this more explicit approach for default handling:

-ClassBuilder.Register(() => Accent switch
-{
-    BitColor.Primary => "bit-tfl-pri",
-    // ... other cases
-    _ => "bit-tfl-pri"
-});
+ClassBuilder.Register(() => Accent switch
+{
+    BitColor.Primary => "bit-tfl-pri",
+    // ... other cases
+    null => string.Empty,
+    _ => "bit-tfl-pri"
+});

This makes it clearer when no accent color is applied versus defaulting to primary.


263-301: Consider default behavior for nullable parameters.

The CSS class registration logic looks comprehensive, but there's an inconsistency in default handling for nullable parameters:

  • Accent (nullable) defaults to "bit-tfl-pri" when null
  • Background (nullable) defaults to "bit-tfl-bpr" when null
  • Border (nullable) defaults to "bit-tfl-brp" when null

Consider whether nullable parameters should return empty strings when null to avoid applying default styling when no explicit value is provided.

If the current behavior is intentional (always applying a default theme), consider adding documentation comments explaining this design decision. Otherwise, you might want to update the switch statements:

ClassBuilder.Register(() => Accent switch
{
    BitColor.Primary => "bit-tfl-pri",
    // ... other cases
-   _ => "bit-tfl-pri"
+   _ => string.Empty
});
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor.cs (1)

22-30: Fix formatting issue with missing line break.

The Background parameter definition is correct, but there's a missing line break before new() on line 22.

            Description = "Automatically adjust the height of the input in Multiline mode.",
-        },new()
+        },
+        new()
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.scss (1)

106-107: Excellent architectural improvement with CSS custom properties.

The migration from hardcoded SCSS variables to CSS custom properties enables dynamic theming capabilities. However, consider adding fallback values for robustness.

Consider adding fallback values to prevent styling issues if custom properties are undefined:

-background-color: var(--bit-tfl-clr-bg);
-border: $shp-border-width $shp-border-style var(--bit-tfl-clr-brd);
+background-color: var(--bit-tfl-clr-bg, #{$clr-bg-pri});
+border: $shp-border-width $shp-border-style var(--bit-tfl-clr-brd, #{$clr-brd-pri});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d32a96c and 55d606e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor (1 hunks)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.scss (9 hunks)
  • src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor (2 hunks)
  • src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor.cs (6 hunks)
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (4)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor.cs
  • src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.scss
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build and test
🔇 Additional comments (44)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.razor.cs (11)

26-29: LGTM! Well-documented new parameter.

The Accent parameter is properly implemented with clear documentation describing its purpose for focus state styling.


37-46: LGTM! Background and Border parameters follow consistent pattern.

Both parameters use BitColorKind? type appropriately. The Border parameter correctly includes the ResetClassBuilder attribute since border changes affect the visual layout and require CSS class rebuilding.


73-76: LGTM! FullWidth parameter implemented correctly.

Simple boolean parameter with clear documentation for controlling the text field's width behavior.


26-29: LGTM! Well-documented accent color parameter.

The new Accent parameter follows established patterns and provides clear documentation about its purpose for focused state styling.


37-40: LGTM! Background color parameter addition.

The Background parameter is properly implemented following the established parameter pattern.


42-46: LGTM! Border color parameter with proper class builder reset.

The Border parameter correctly includes the [ResetClassBuilder] attribute since it affects the component's CSS classes.


73-76: LGTM! FullWidth parameter addition.

The FullWidth parameter is well-documented and follows the established boolean parameter pattern.


26-29: LGTM! Well-defined Accent parameter.

The new Accent parameter is properly implemented with:

  • Correct nullable BitColor? type for optional usage
  • Clear XML documentation describing its purpose
  • Appropriate naming that follows component conventions

37-46: LGTM! Background and Border parameters properly implemented.

Both new parameters are correctly defined:

  • Background parameter for controlling background color kind
  • Border parameter for controlling border color kind with appropriate [ResetClassBuilder] attribute
  • Clear XML documentation for both parameters
  • Consistent use of nullable BitColorKind? type

The ResetClassBuilder attribute on the Border parameter is correctly applied since border changes require CSS class rebuilding.


73-76: LGTM! FullWidth parameter correctly implemented.

The FullWidth parameter is well-defined with:

  • Appropriate bool type for binary on/off functionality
  • Clear documentation explaining the 100% width behavior
  • Consistent naming pattern with other component parameters

261-301: LGTM! Comprehensive CSS class registrations.

The CSS class registrations for the new parameters are well-implemented:

  1. FullWidth (line 261): Simple and correct boolean-based class registration
  2. Accent (lines 263-283): Comprehensive switch statement covering all BitColor enum values with consistent CSS class naming pattern (bit-tfl-{abbreviation})
  3. Background (lines 285-292): Complete BitColorKind enum coverage with appropriate class names (bit-tfl-b{abbreviation})
  4. Border (lines 294-301): Complete BitColorKind enum coverage with consistent naming (bit-tfl-br{abbreviation})

All switch statements include proper default cases falling back to primary colors, ensuring robust behavior even with unexpected enum values.

src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor (11)

222-248: LGTM! Comprehensive Background and Border demos.

The new demo examples effectively showcase the Background and Border parameters with all available BitColorKind values. The use of a styled container with var(--bit-clr-bg-dis) background helps visualize the transparent options.


250-290: Excellent comprehensive Accent color demonstration.

This demo thoroughly covers all BitColor enum values with clear visual organization. The nested div with different background for showcasing background colors is a nice touch that helps users understand the visual impact of different accent colors.


185-220: LGTM! Comprehensive validation example.

The validation example has been properly reorganized and demonstrates good coverage of form validation scenarios with BitTextField.


222-248: LGTM! Excellent demonstration of new color parameters.

The Background and Border examples provide comprehensive coverage of the new BitColorKind options, showing practical usage with visual context (disabled background for better contrast).


250-290: LGTM! Comprehensive accent color showcase.

The Accent example thoroughly demonstrates all BitColor enum values with good visual organization, including proper background contrast for visibility of background-related colors.


292-337: LGTM! Well-structured Style & Class and RTL examples.

The examples provide good demonstrations of custom styling capabilities and RTL support, showing both the new features and established patterns working together.


185-185: LGTM! Logical demo reorganization.

The validation example has been appropriately moved to example11, creating space for the new styling parameter demos. This reorganization improves the logical flow of the documentation.


222-234: LGTM! Effective Background parameter demonstration.

The Background demo example effectively showcases the new functionality:

  • Demonstrates all BitColorKind values (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Transparent)
  • Uses a contrasting background container to highlight the background color effects
  • Includes consistent icon usage for visual appeal
  • Clear, descriptive explanation of the feature

The demo provides good educational value for developers learning to use the Background parameter.


236-248: LGTM! Consistent Border parameter demonstration.

The Border demo example follows the established pattern effectively:

  • Comprehensive coverage of all BitColorKind values
  • Consistent styling with contrasting background for visibility
  • Clear documentation explaining the border color functionality
  • Maintains consistency with the Background demo structure

250-290: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured Accent demo.

The Accent demo example is exceptionally well-implemented:

  • Complete coverage: Demonstrates all BitColor enum values
  • Smart visual design: Uses contrasting backgrounds (lines 270-276) to make background color variants visible
  • Logical grouping: Separates standard colors from background/foreground/border variants
  • Consistent pattern: Maintains icon usage and clear labeling throughout
  • Educational value: Provides developers with a complete reference for accent color options

The thoughtful handling of visibility for background color variants shows attention to user experience.


292-337: LGTM! Appropriate demo relocation.

The Style & Class and RTL demos have been appropriately moved to accommodate the new parameter demos:

  • Content and functionality remain intact
  • RTL demo appropriately positioned at the end
  • Maintains educational value and code examples
  • Example numbering updated consistently
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextField.scss (12)

77-79: LGTM! Simple and effective full-width utility.

The .bit-tfl-fwd class provides a clean way to make text fields occupy full container width.


106-107: Excellent architectural improvement with CSS custom properties.

Replacing hardcoded SCSS variables with CSS custom properties enables dynamic theming through the new color classes. This is a significant improvement for maintainability and flexibility.


135-162: LGTM! Consistent class renames and custom property usage.

The password reveal button class renames match the changes in the Razor file, and the updated styling correctly uses the new CSS custom properties for dynamic theming.


77-79: LGTM! Simple and effective full width utility class.

The .bit-tfl-fwd class provides a clean way to implement the FullWidth parameter functionality.


135-163: LGTM! CSS class renaming for consistency.

The password reveal button class names have been updated for better organization and consistency:

  • .bit-tfl-prb.bit-tfl-rpb
  • .bit-tfl-rin.bit-tfl-rpc
  • .bit-tfl-ric.bit-tfl-rpi

The functionality remains the same while improving maintainability.


317-417: LGTM! Comprehensive theme class implementation.

The new CSS classes provide excellent coverage for all color theme variations:

  • Accent colors (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Info, Success, Warning, etc.)
  • Background color kinds (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Transparent)
  • Border color kinds (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Transparent)

The systematic naming convention (bit-tfl-[type][abbreviation]) makes the classes easy to understand and maintain.


77-79: LGTM! Clean full width utility implementation.

The new .bit-tfl-fwd utility class is well-implemented:

  • Simple, focused functionality (width: 100%)
  • Follows established naming conventions
  • Provides clean separation of layout concerns

106-107: LGTM! Excellent architectural improvement with CSS custom properties.

The replacement of hardcoded SCSS variables with CSS custom properties is a significant improvement:

  • background-color: var(--bit-tfl-clr-bg) enables dynamic background theming
  • border: ... var(--bit-tfl-clr-brd) enables dynamic border theming
  • This approach provides much greater flexibility than static SCSS variables
  • Enables runtime theme switching through CSS class changes

This architectural change is the foundation for the new theming capabilities.


135-162: LGTM! Password reveal button classes improved.

The password reveal button classes have been enhanced:

  • Better naming: More descriptive class names (rpb, rpc, rpi vs prb, rin, ric)
  • Dynamic theming: Updated to use var(--bit-tfl-clr) custom property
  • Consistency: Aligns with the component's new theming architecture

These changes maintain functionality while enabling the new accent color feature for password reveal buttons.


238-267: LGTM! Comprehensive focused state theming.

The focused state implementation correctly adopts CSS custom properties:

  • Icon theming: .bit-tfl-ico uses var(--bit-tfl-clr) when focused
  • Prefix/Suffix theming: Both elements use the accent color when focused
  • Border theming: Focus borders use var(--bit-tfl-clr) for consistent accent application
  • Underlined variant: Properly handles the different border approach for underlined fields

This ensures cohesive accent color application across all interactive elements during focus.


275-275: LGTM! Underlined variant properly themed.

The underlined variant correctly uses var(--bit-tfl-clr-brd) for the bottom border, ensuring that the Border parameter affects underlined text fields appropriately. This maintains consistency across all text field variants.


317-417: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured color theme implementation.

The color theme classes are excellently implemented:

Accent Colors (lines 317-383):

  • Complete coverage of all BitColor enum values
  • Consistent naming pattern (bit-tfl-{abbreviation})
  • Proper mapping of SCSS color variables to --bit-tfl-clr custom property

Background Colors (lines 386-400):

  • Complete BitColorKind coverage including transparent option
  • Clear naming pattern (bit-tfl-b{abbreviation})
  • Correct mapping to --bit-tfl-clr-bg custom property

Border Colors (lines 403-417):

  • Complete BitColorKind coverage including transparent option
  • Consistent naming pattern (bit-tfl-br{abbreviation})
  • Proper mapping to --bit-tfl-clr-brd custom property

This implementation provides a robust foundation for dynamic theming and aligns perfectly with the component's new parameters.

src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/TextField/BitTextFieldDemo.razor.cs (10)

7-15: LGTM! Well-structured parameter addition.

The new Accent parameter follows the established pattern and provides clear documentation with appropriate type and linking.


31-39: LGTM! Parameter definitions are well-structured.

Both Border and FullWidth parameters follow the established documentation pattern with appropriate types and descriptions.

Also applies to: 78-83


288-289: Good modernization with list initializer syntax.

The change from new() to [...] list initializer syntax improves code clarity and follows modern C# conventions.

Also applies to: 402-402


409-519: Comprehensive and well-documented color enum.

The BitColor enum provides a complete set of semantic and structural color options with clear descriptions. The sequential numbering and categorization are appropriate for a UI component library.


520-552: Well-defined color kind enum.

The BitColorKind enum provides essential color categories with clear documentation and appropriate sequential values.


815-866: Excellent comprehensive validation example.

The validation example demonstrates proper usage of EditForm, DataAnnotationsValidator, and various validation attributes. This provides valuable educational content for users implementing form validation.


867-871: Proper usage of background color options.

The background color examples correctly demonstrate all BitColorKind values with consistent iconography for visual clarity.


873-877: Clear demonstration of border color options.

The border color examples appropriately showcase all BitColorKind values in a clean, understandable format.


902-1012: Comprehensive custom styling demonstration.

The custom styling example provides excellent educational value, showing both CSS-based styling and dynamic class binding. The CSS transitions and focus states are well-implemented.


1014-1022: Well-implemented RTL internationalization example.

The RTL example effectively demonstrates right-to-left language support with appropriate Persian text and proper Dir property usage.

@msynk msynk merged commit 17e3b6f into bitfoundation:develop May 31, 2025
3 checks passed
@msynk msynk deleted the 10883-blazorui-textfield-missing-parameters branch May 31, 2025 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing parameters from the BitTextField component

2 participants