Address book accounts: bind to accounts (again) #1184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 tasks
rfc2822
deleted the
1179-address-books-removed-randomly-with-multiple-accounts-in-445-beta
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR shall resolve these issues:
In previous versions, the binding from address books to accounts has been removed. However this caused problems because
Syncerthen can't get a list of address books of the current account, and then mixes some operations (like deletion) with other accounts.This PR binds address books to accounts again. However it still cleanly separates address books (address book accounts) from accounts. For instance,
AccountsSettings()still can never be created for an address book (like in earlier DAVx5 versions).