Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add address-based index (attempt 4?) #14053
Add address-based index (attempt 4?) #14053
Changes from all commits
4c4c0cf
545bc46
0f85eb9
cd27402
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this isn't the information that we want to save in the address index. For a given scriptPubKey, a user wants to know:
So here, I think you want to save the txid and input index spending the coin. You're actually saving the txid and output index that creates the coin, because you're using the prevout.
(I'm not entirely sure about this. Perhaps you are trying to return the outpoint that created the coin in the spent outputs array, but that's not clear to me from the RPC documentation).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is correct because he is using the prevout in the key. When looking up by this script with this outpoint, one would want to find this transaction because it spends this outpoint.
AFAICT the value just contains the position of the relevant transaction on disk and the scriptPubKey (to detect collisions). The value does not contain any indexes into inputs or outputs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a comment with your key/value format somewhere and the justification?