-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE #372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ACK for me except a nit that might be a english mistake on my part:
I would say
|
@NicolasDorier fixed. Thanks |
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
<pre> | |||
<pre> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dont see it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@luke-jr I think there was a hidden character but this PR removes it. Isn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarcoFalke I think there was a BOM before, not now
All components in the original algorithm, including the behavior <code>OP_CODESEPERATOR</code>, remains unchanged. The only difference is the way of serialization and the inclusion of amount being spent. | ||
Semantics of the original sighash types remain unchanged, except the followings: | ||
# The way of serialization is changed; | ||
# All sighash types commit the amount being spent by the signed input; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
commit to the amount being spent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
revised and squashed
This PR clarifies the semantics change when ANYONECANPAY is used with SINGLE, with other minor clarifications