BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints #371
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source
|
I only accept Luke input at transistor level if he talk to me as electronic On 17 April 2016 at 23:18, Luke-Jr notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity
Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source to resolve ambiguity regarding the binary representation of txids.
Based on feedback from @SamouraiDev