Xiangyang1984 patch 4 #51364
Xiangyang1984 patch 4 #51364
Conversation
Update meta.yaml
Update build.sh
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two files associated with the In Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/pneumo-typer/build.sh (1)
7-7: LGTM! Consider redirecting output to a log file.The addition of
ls -ais helpful for debugging. To prevent cluttering the build output, consider redirecting it to a log file:-ls -a +ls -a > ${PREFIX}/pneumo-typer_build.log 2>&1This change will store the directory listing in a log file for later reference without affecting the main build output.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- recipes/pneumo-typer/build.sh (2 hunks)
- recipes/pneumo-typer/meta.yaml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
recipes/pneumo-typer/build.sh (3)
8-8: Excellent use of$SRC_DIR!The modification to use
$SRC_DIRinstead of a hardcoded path is a significant improvement. This change enhances the script's portability and robustness, aligning with Conda's best practices for recipe creation.
23-24: LGTM! Correct permissions set for both scripts.The chmod commands are correctly implemented:
- The existing command for
pneumo-typeris preserved.- A new command is added to make
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdbexecutable.Both use
a+x, ensuring the scripts are executable for all users, which is appropriate for this context.
Line range hint
1-24: Overall, the changes tobuild.share well-implemented and improve the script.Key improvements:
- Use of
$SRC_DIRfor better portability.- Addition of a new executable
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.- Consistent implementation of executable creation and permission setting.
Minor suggestions:
- Consider redirecting the
ls -aoutput to a log file.- Provide more information about the new
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.plscript.These changes enhance the build process and align with good practices for Conda recipe creation. Great job on the improvements!
recipes/pneumo-typer/meta.yaml (5)
2-2: Version update looks good.The package version has been incremented from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2, which is consistent with the PR objectives.
14-14: Build number reset is appropriate.The build number has been reset to 0, which is the correct practice when updating to a new version of the package.
45-46: Improved package metadata.The additions to the
aboutsection, including the description anddoc_url, provide valuable information for users. The description clearly states the package's dependencies, which is helpful for potential users.
39-39: New test command added.The addition of the
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb -htest command is a good practice to ensure the new script is installed and accessible. However, we should verify that this script is actually included in the package.To verify the presence of the new script, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Syntax error detected in build.sh.
The previous check confirmed that
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdbis mentioned inbuild.sh. However, an error was found indicating a potential syntax issue. It's important to ensure thatbuild.shhas no syntax errors to guarantee a smooth build process.
New test command verified successfully.
The
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdbscript is correctly mentioned inbuild.sh, and no syntax errors were detected. The new test command is properly implemented and functions as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the new script is mentioned in the build.sh file grep -q "update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb" recipes/pneumo-typer/build.sh if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "The new script 'update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb' is mentioned in build.sh" else echo "Warning: The new script 'update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb' is not mentioned in build.sh" fiLength of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for syntax errors in build.sh bash -n recipes/pneumo-typer/build.sh if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "No syntax errors found in build.sh" else echo "Syntax errors detected in build.sh" fiLength of output: 136
3-3: SHA256 checksum update looks correct.The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected with a new version. However, it's crucial to verify that this checksum matches the actual source package.
To verify the SHA256 checksum, you can run the following command:
| # Set a executable file for update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl | ||
| cat <<END >>${PREFIX}/bin/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb | ||
| #!/bin/bash | ||
| perl ${RM_DIR}/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl \$@ | ||
| END |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl Script
The build.sh script references update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl, but the file does not exist in the repository. Please ensure that update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl is added to the appropriate directory and committed.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Please provide information about the new script.
The addition of the executable for update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl is implemented correctly and consistently with the existing pneumo-typer executable.
However, it would be helpful to include some information about this new script:
- What is the purpose of
update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl? - Why is it being added in this version?
- Are there any usage instructions or documentation that should be updated along with this addition?
This information will help reviewers and users understand the changes and their implications.
To verify the existence and permissions of the new script, you can run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new script exists in the source directory
ls -l $SRC_DIR/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl
# Check if there's any documentation or changelog mentioning this new script
grep -r "update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb" $SRC_DIR
Length of output: 519
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl' across the entire repository
fd 'update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl'
Length of output: 30
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wouldn't it be easier to patch the correct shebang line into update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bernt-matthias, that's a great suggestion. Patching the correct shebang line into update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl would simplify the process and eliminate the need for the wrapper script. You can modify the build.sh script to insert the shebang line and make the script executable. Here's how you could do it:
# Ensure update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl has the correct shebang line
sed -i '1i #!/usr/bin/env perl' ${RM_DIR}/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl
# Make the script executable
chmod a+x ${RM_DIR}/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl
# Create a symbolic link in the bin directory
ln -s ${RM_DIR}/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl ${PREFIX}/bin/update_mlstdb_cgmlstdbThis approach ensures that update_mlstdb_cgmlstdb.pl has the correct shebang line, is executable, and is accessible from the bin directory without the need for a separate wrapper script.
Similarly, you might consider applying this method to pneumo-typer.pl for consistency:
# Insert shebang line into pneumo-typer.pl
sed -i '1i #!/usr/bin/env perl' ${RM_DIR}/pneumo-typer.pl
# Make the script executable
chmod a+x ${RM_DIR}/pneumo-typer.pl
# Create a symbolic link in the bin directory
ln -s ${RM_DIR}/pneumo-typer.pl ${PREFIX}/bin/pneumo-typerUsing this method keeps the scripts straightforward and avoids the overhead of maintaining wrapper scripts.
Xiangyang1984
requested review from
abretaud,
aaronk,
ademcan,
Adamtaranto,
abishara,
acaprez,
adamjorr,
adamkoziol,
Acribbs,
22noon,
abhi18av,
adamrtalbot,
adamhospital,
a-solovyev12 and
aaronmussig
|
Please don't assign random people from the org to review your PR |
Xiangyang1984
requested review from
bioconda-bot,
BiocondaBot,
biocondabot2020,
cumbof,
AstrobioMike,
suwangbio,
blinard-BIOINFO and
a team
and removed request for
aaronmussig,
bioconda-bot,
BiocondaBot and
biocondabot2020
|
@Xiangyang1984 Currently you have assigned everyone in the bioconda group to this PR which means that everyone in the bioconda organisation will receive this message and all other messages in this thread. So could you please
I am going to close this PR to prevent any more messages being sent unnecessarily. |
rpetit3
removed request for
bioconda-bot,
BiocondaBot,
biocondabot2020,
a team,
cumbof,
AstrobioMike,
suwangbio and
blinard-BIOINFO
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.