-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added ReferenceMapping for Genotype, filterByOverlappingRegion for GenotypeRDDFunctions #470
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seeing this chain of getters makes me wonder if we should protect against null values? Using
Option()
andorNull
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the general direction we're moving in (e.g., #469) is to require the API caller to provide input with valid mappings.
From a practical standpoint though, variants are meaningless without being anchored to a reference position. If you get to the point where you have variants without mappings attached to them, you've done something wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, since you use the variant three times, you can define it once using...
And then use pattern matching or a simple conditional to skip genotypes without a variant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Genotypes without a variant are ill formed... IMO, we shouldn't check for that case. If we did want to validate that genotypes had a variant attached, it should only be via an assert.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, variants are not nullable in the genotype schema:
https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/bdg-formats/pull/39/files changes this, although it is arguable as to whether that is a desirable change (desirable because it makes everything nullable, undesirable because genotypes without variants are meaningless).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you ever want to project a Genotype without the variant? If so, then you need to make it nullable. If not, then we don't need to worry about the null check here as you say.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it isn't nullable now, no reason to do the check.
Let's discuss this on the PR that makes the change. Conceivably, you could, but not sure if it makes sense to allow people to.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
-Matt
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Frank Austin Nothaft <
notifications@github.com> wrote: