Removed unused import and restored existing checks #1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benrg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2022
* Removed unused import * Restored existing checks * Restored coerce_e, _E and data property * Deprecated coerce_e Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <radarhere@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suggestions for python-pillow#6254
numbersis imported but unused - https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/runs/6245537875?check_suite_focus=true. I've removed the import here.im.point(lambda x: x - 1)andim.point(lambda x: x / 1). Unless you have thoughts otherwise, it seems nicer to keep the previous checks in.coerce_eis a public method. So I've added a commit here restoringcoerce_eand thedataproperty. I've also kept the original name of_E. Again, it may not matter either way, but I think keeping the same name is better than changing it for now.coerce_e. There's no need for users to have access to it, so in future,_Ecan be changed however we like.