Skip to content

Conversation

bendoerr
Copy link
Member

@bendoerr bendoerr commented Apr 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated workflows for pull request labeling and release publishing, including categorized changelog generation and contributor attribution.
    • Added configuration for automatic labeling of pull requests based on branch name patterns.
  • CI/CD

    • Updated multiple GitHub Actions to their latest versions across workflows for improved security and reliability.
    • Enforced stricter error handling in linting jobs.
    • Enhanced workflow security with updated runner hardening steps.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces new configuration files and workflows to automate changelog generation, pull request labeling, and release publishing within GitHub Actions. It adds labeler and changelog configuration files for categorizing and formatting changelogs, and implements new workflows for labeling pull requests and publishing releases based on version tags. Several existing workflows are updated to use newer versions of their respective GitHub Actions, and some parameters are refined for stricter error handling and improved artifact management. No changes are made to application logic or exported entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/changelog.json New configuration file specifying changelog categories and template for automated changelog generation.
.github/labeler.yml New configuration file defining automatic labeling rules for pull requests based on branch name patterns.
.github/workflows/pr-label.yml
.github/workflows/release.yml
New GitHub Actions workflows: one for automatic pull request labeling, and one for changelog generation and release publishing triggered by version tag pushes.
.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml
.github/workflows/lint.yml
Updated versions of GitHub Actions used in dependency review, scorecard, test, and lint workflows. Adjusted parameters for stricter error handling and improved artifact management in some workflows. No changes to workflow logic or control flow.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub
    participant Labeler Action
    participant Release Workflow
    participant Changelog Builder

    Developer->>GitHub: Open Pull Request / Push Tag
    alt Pull Request Event
        GitHub->>Labeler Action: Trigger PR labeling workflow
        Labeler Action->>GitHub: Apply labels based on branch name
    else Tag Push Event (v*.*.*)
        GitHub->>Release Workflow: Trigger release workflow
        Release Workflow->>Changelog Builder: Generate changelog using config
        Changelog Builder->>Release Workflow: Return changelog content
        Release Workflow->>GitHub: Publish release with changelog
    end
Loading

Suggested labels

github_actions

Suggested reviewers

  • bendoerr

Poem

A rabbit hopped through YAML fields,
With changelogs, labels, workflows sealed.
Actions upgraded, tags in sight,
Releases bloom with automated might.
From branch to tag, the process flows—
In gardened code, efficiency grows!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 24, 2025
@bendoerr bendoerr added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file cicd labels Apr 24, 2025
@bendoerr bendoerr force-pushed the feature/release-and-updates branch from 7f00e9c to c759f04 Compare April 24, 2025 16:15
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f00e9c and c759f04.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/changelog.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/labeler.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (7 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr-label.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
.github/changelog.json (1)

24-25: Verify changelog template placeholders.
Ensure that the chosen changelog generator supports the ${{CHANGELOG}} and ${{CONTRIBUTORS}} syntax in this JSON template. If it uses a different interpolation format, update the template accordingly to avoid runtime errors.

.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

17-17: Approve hardened runner upgrade.
Upgrading step-security/harden-runner to v2.12.0 aligns with our security hardening strategy and is consistent with other workflows.


22-22: Approve checkout action bump.
Pinning actions/checkout to v4.2.2 is appropriate and matches the upgrade policy across workflows.


25-25: Approve Go setup action bump.
Upgrading actions/setup-go to v5.4.0 is consistent with other pipelines and should deliver the latest features and fixes.

.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (2)

20-20: Approve hardened runner upgrade.
Upgrading step-security/harden-runner to v2.12.0 in the dependency review job is consistent with other workflows and improves runner security.


27-27: Approve Dependency Review action bump.
Pinning actions/dependency-review-action to v4.6.0 brings in the latest dependency scanning enhancements.

.github/workflows/pr-label.yml (2)

18-18: Approve hardened runner upgrade.
Using step-security/harden-runner@v2.12.0 here keeps security policies consistent across all workflows.


22-22: Verify labeler action compatibility.
Confirm that actions/labeler@v5.0.0 supports the head-branch key patterns defined in .github/labeler.yml. If there have been breaking changes in v5.x, adjust to a compatible version or update the config format.

.github/workflows/lint.yml (9)

20-23: Consistent runner hardening across all lint jobs
All jobs now pin step-security/harden-runner@v2.12.0 with egress-policy: audit, matching updates in other CI workflows and ensuring uniform security posture.

Also applies to: 40-43, 60-63, 80-83, 101-104, 122-124, 142-145, 160-163


26-31: Upgrade tflint integration and enforce failure on errors
Bumped reviewdog/action-tflint to v1.24.2 and switched fail_on_error to true so that tflint findings block pull requests, improving code quality enforcement.


46-52: Upgrade trivy integration and enforce failure on errors
Updated reviewdog/action-trivy to v1.13.10 and set fail_on_error: true, ensuring any configuration misconfigurations are surfaced immediately.


66-72: Enforce failure for golangci-lint reports
Although the golangci-lint action version remains at v2.8.0, toggling fail_on_error: true ensures lint violations fail the build, aligning with other CI checks.


89-94: Enforce failure for prettier checks
The EPMatt/reviewdog-action-prettier step now has fail_on_error: true, so formatting issues must be resolved before merging.


107-113: Upgrade misspell integration with non-blocking mode
Bumped reviewdog/action-misspell to v1.26.3 while keeping fail_on_error: false, allowing typos to be reported without impeding PR workflow noise.


128-133: Upgrade alex integration with non-blocking mode
Updated reviewdog/action-alex to v1.16.0 and retained fail_on_error: false for stylistic guidance rather than enforcement.


148-152: Upgrade markdownlint integration with non-blocking mode
Switched to reviewdog/action-markdownlint@v0.26.2 and kept fail_on_error: false so markdown style feedback is informative but not blocking.


166-171: Upgrade actionlint integration and enforce failures
Bumped reviewdog/action-actionlint to v1.65.2 and set fail_on_error: true so workflow definition issues will block merges, improving CI reliability.

.github/workflows/release.yml (4)

1-9: Define release trigger and minimal read permissions
The workflow is named “Publish release” and triggers on push of v*.*.* tags, with top-level contents: read permission. This correctly scopes credentials while reacting to semantic version tags.


21-24: Harden runner for release job
Pins step-security/harden-runner@v2.12.0 with egress-policy: audit, matching other CI jobs and ensuring a secure execution environment for the release pipeline.


27-33: Configure changelog builder action
Pins mikepenz/release-changelog-builder-action@v5, uses .github/changelog.json, and sets failOnError: "true" and fetchReviewers: "true". These settings will auto-generate changelogs, fail on errors, and pull in reviewer suggestions—ideal for reliable releases.


34-38: Create GitHub release with generated changelog
Pins softprops/action-gh-release@v2.2.2, conditioned on refs/tags/, and uses the built changelog as the release body. This automates publishing with correct version tags and release notes.

.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (4)

35-38: Upgrade runner hardening in Scorecard job
Pins step-security/harden-runner@v2.12.0 with egress-policy: audit, consistent with other supply-chain security and lint workflows.


45-50: Bump Scorecard action version
Updated ossf/scorecard-action from v2.4.0 to v2.4.1 to pull in the latest fixes without altering existing configuration or behavior.


67-72: Upgrade artifact upload action
Switched actions/upload-artifact to v4.6.2, ensuring reliable SARIF artifact storage with the latest improvements.


75-79: Upgrade SARIF upload action
Bumped github/codeql-action/upload-sarif to v3.28.16 so code scanning results are uploaded using the most recent stable release.

@bendoerr bendoerr merged commit 4e5a7cc into main Apr 24, 2025
18 checks passed
@bendoerr bendoerr deleted the feature/release-and-updates branch April 24, 2025 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cicd dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant