Skip to content

Update Linting #25

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2025
Merged

Update Linting #25

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 1, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@antfu/eslint-config 4.13.2 -> 4.16.1 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) 9.28.0 -> 9.30.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-svelte (source) 3.9.0 -> 3.10.1 age adoption passing confidence
lint-staged 16.1.0 -> 16.1.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

antfu/eslint-config (@​antfu/eslint-config)

v4.16.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.16.0

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
    View changes on GitHub

v4.15.0

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
    View changes on GitHub

v4.14.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.14.0

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.13.3

Compare Source

No significant changes

    View changes on GitHub
eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.30.0

Compare Source

v9.29.0

Compare Source

sveltejs/eslint-plugin-svelte (eslint-plugin-svelte)

v3.10.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.10.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v3.9.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.9.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.9.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1239 a3d4224 Thanks @​baseballyama! - fix(prefer-const): Use additionalProperties instead of ignoreReadonly to match the ESLint core rule option name.
lint-staged/lint-staged (lint-staged)

v16.1.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1570 a7c0c88 Thanks @​ItsNickBarry! - When using --diff-filter with the D option to include deleted staged files, lint-staged no longer tries to stage the deleted files, unless they're no longer deleted. Previously this caused an error from git add like fatal: pathspec 'deleted-file' did not match any files.

  • 38f942e Thanks @​iiroj! - Removed an extraneous log entry that printed shouldHidePArtiallyStagedFiles to console output.

v16.1.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1565 3686977 Thanks @​iiroj! - Lint-staged now explicitly warns about potential data loss when using --no-stash.

  • #​1571 02299a9 Thanks @​iiroj! - Function tasks (introduced in v16.0.0) only received the staged files matching the conpmnfigured glob, instead of all staged files.

  • #​1563 bc61c74 Thanks @​iiroj! - This version fixes incorrect behavior where unstaged changes were committed when using the --no-stash option. This happened because --no-stash implied --no-hide-partially-staged, meaning unstaged changes to files which also had other staged changes were added to the commit by lint-staged; this is no longer the case.

    The previous (incorrect) behavior can still be achieved by using both options --no-stash --no-hide-partially-staged at the same time.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, on day 1 of the month ( * 0-3 1 * * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Jul 1, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linting branch from 235b305 to 1adbd3d Compare July 1, 2025 03:17
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 7a42b23 into main Jul 1, 2025
3 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/linting branch July 1, 2025 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants