Add packaging package

[ubreblanca]

The problem: packaging is imported in acquisition.py but not defined in pyproject.toml. This leads to a ModuleNotFoundError when trying to import bayes_opt after installing the requirements.

~/BayesianOptimization % uv sync
Using CPython 3.14.1
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Resolved 190 packages in 79ms
      Built bayesian-optimization @ file:///Users/user/BayesianOptimization
Prepared 1 package in 449ms
Installed 7 packages in 31ms
 + bayesian-optimization==3.1.0 (from file:///Users/user/BayesianOptimization)
 + colorama==0.4.6
 + joblib==1.5.3
 + numpy==2.4.0
 + scikit-learn==1.8.0
 + scipy==1.16.3
 + threadpoolctl==3.6.0

~/BayesianOptimization % uv run python -c "import bayes_opt"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
    import bayes_opt
  File "/Users/user/BayesianOptimization/bayes_opt/__init__.py", line 7, in <module>
    from bayes_opt import acquisition
  File "/Users/user/BayesianOptimization/bayes_opt/acquisition.py", line 30, in <module>
    from packaging import version
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'packaging'

~/BayesianOptimization % uv add packaging
Resolved 190 packages in 82ms
      Built bayesian-optimization @ file:///Users/user/BayesianOptimization
Prepared 1 package in 426ms
Uninstalled 1 package in 0.86ms
Installed 2 packages in 1ms
 ~ bayesian-optimization==3.1.0 (from file:///Users/user/BayesianOptimization)
 + packaging==25.0

~/BayesianOptimization % uv sync
Resolved 190 packages in 2ms
Audited 8 packages in 0.48ms

~/BayesianOptimization % uv run python -c "import bayes_opt"

~/BayesianOptimization % 

Solution: This adds packaging to the project dependencies.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated project dependencies to require the Python packaging library (packaging) version >= 20.0.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single runtime dependency packaging>=20.0 was added to the project's [project] dependencies in pyproject.toml. This is a configuration-level change with no functional or control-flow modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Dependency Addition pyproject.toml	Added runtime dependency constraint packaging>=20.0 to the [project] dependencies section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A tiny line hops into view,
packaging@twenty joins the crew,
No code to change, just tidy and bright,
Dependencies snug for morning and night 🌙✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically identifies the main change: adding the packaging dependency to the project.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7e005d and aff39f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pyproject.toml

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• pyproject.toml

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

pyproject.toml (1)

23-23: Use a more conservative version constraint for better compatibility.

The packaging>=25.0 constraint is unnecessarily restrictive. Since the code only uses packaging.version.parse() — a stable API available since v14.1 (2014) — a more conservative constraint like >=20.0 would provide broader compatibility and reduce potential dependency conflicts with other packages that specify lower version bounds.

Consider changing to:

-    "packaging>=25.0",
+    "packaging>=20.0",

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c410d51 and d7e005d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pyproject.toml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.89%. Comparing base (c410d51) to head (aff39f7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #596   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.89%   97.89%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1185     1185           
=======================================
  Hits         1160     1160           
  Misses         25       25           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[till-m]

Thanks for the contribution!