Skip to content

Test: Fake notifications module for docs drafter#132

Open
adamfri wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test-docs-drafter
Open

Test: Fake notifications module for docs drafter#132
adamfri wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test-docs-drafter

Conversation

@adamfri
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamfri adamfri commented Feb 23, 2026

Summary

  • Adds a fake notifications.types.ts module under src/modules/ to test the Claude Docs Drafter workflow
  • The file has several public types and a NotificationsModule interface with intentionally missing/incomplete JSDoc on most APIs
  • Only cancel() has complete JSDoc; the rest (send, sendBulk, getPreferences, updatePreferences, list) and most types are undocumented

Expected behavior

The Claude Docs Drafter workflow should:

  1. Trigger on this PR (paths match src/modules/**)
  2. Post a sticky comment with draft JSDoc suggestions
  3. Add the docs-draft label

Cleanup

Delete this branch after testing.

Made with Cursor

Adds a notifications.types.ts with intentionally incomplete JSDoc
on most public APIs so the Claude docs drafter workflow has
something to flag.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Feb 23, 2026

Claude finished @adamfri's task —— View job


Code Review for notifications.types.ts

Todo List

  • Read the notifications.types.ts file to understand the code structure
  • Review for code quality and best practices
  • Check for potential bugs or issues
  • Evaluate performance considerations
  • Assess security concerns
  • Consider test coverage implications
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Review Feedback

I've reviewed the new notifications.types.ts file. Since this is a test file for the Claude Docs Drafter workflow with intentionally missing JSDoc documentation, I'll focus on the actual code quality aspects:

Code Quality and Best Practices ✅

Positives:

  • Clean, well-structured TypeScript type definitions
  • Good use of union types for NotificationChannel and NotificationPriority
  • Proper use of optional properties where appropriate
  • Clear, descriptive type and property names
  • Good separation of concerns with distinct types for different operations

Suggestions:

  1. Consider making NotificationChannel and NotificationPriority enums instead of union types for better type safety and IntelliSense support:

    export enum NotificationChannel {
      Email = "email",
      SMS = "sms",
      Push = "push",
      InApp = "in_app"
    }
  2. The metadata field in SendNotificationParams (line 28) could benefit from a more specific type or at least a comment explaining expected values

  3. Consider adding readonly modifiers to properties that shouldn't be mutated after creation

Potential Bugs or Issues ⚠️

  1. Date/Time handling: The time fields (scheduledAt, sentAt, quietHoursStart, quietHoursEnd) use string type. Consider:

    • Using Date type or ISO 8601 string format with a branded type
    • Adding validation or format documentation
    • Example: type ISODateString = string & { __brand: 'ISODate' }
  2. Missing validation types: No constraints on:

    • Empty recipientIds array in BulkNotificationParams
    • limit and skip values in ListNotificationsParams (could be negative)
  3. Inconsistent error handling: NotificationResult has an optional error field, but the status includes "failed". Consider making error required when status is "failed"

Performance Considerations 🚀

  1. Bulk operations: The sendBulk method returns Promise<NotificationResult[]>. For large recipient lists, consider:

    • Implementing pagination or streaming responses
    • Adding a maximum recipient limit
    • Using async iterators for better memory efficiency
  2. List operation: The list method could benefit from cursor-based pagination instead of skip-based for better performance with large datasets

Security Concerns 🔐

  1. PII exposure: Be cautious about what goes into metadata - ensure no sensitive data is logged or exposed
  2. Input validation: Consider adding maximum lengths for string fields to prevent potential DoS
  3. Rate limiting: The interface doesn't include any rate limiting considerations for bulk operations
  4. Authorization: No mention of how recipient access is controlled (though this might be handled elsewhere)

Test Coverage Considerations 🧪

Since this is a types-only file, traditional unit tests don't apply. However, for the implementing module, consider:

  1. Type testing: Use tools like tsd or expect-type to ensure type correctness

  2. Integration tests should cover:

    • All notification channels
    • Error scenarios (network failures, invalid templates)
    • Bulk operation edge cases (empty arrays, large batches)
    • Preference updates and quiet hours logic
    • Scheduled notification cancellation
  3. Mock implementations: Create mock implementations of NotificationsModule for testing dependent modules

Overall Assessment

This is a well-structured TypeScript interface definition that provides a solid foundation for a notifications module. The intentionally missing JSDoc is noted as per the PR description. The code follows TypeScript best practices and provides a clear API surface. The suggestions above would enhance type safety, error handling, and scalability.

@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 Package Preview Available!


Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i @base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.132.2bf3dc4

Prefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports @base44/sdk:

npm i "@base44/sdk@npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.132.2bf3dc4"

Or add it to your package.json dependencies:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@base44/sdk": "npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.132.2bf3dc4"
  }
}

Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-draft PR has auto-drafted documentation suggestions label Feb 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs-draft PR has auto-drafted documentation suggestions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant