Improve SDK documentation TOC structure and organization

[wixysam]

Summary

This PR significantly improves the SDK documentation structure and TOC organization for better navigation and readability.

Changes

TOC Improvements:

• Enhanced CSS to show depth-2 TOC items (methods) while hiding deeper levels (Parameters, Returns, Examples)
• Demoted example headings in type definitions to prevent TOC clutter

Documentation Structure:

• Added "Overview" heading to organize intro sections consistently across all modules
• Grouped type definitions under dedicated "Type Definitions" sections for entities, functions, and agents modules
• Renamed "EntityHandler" section to "Entity Handler Methods" for better clarity
• Split integrations methods into "Core Integrations Methods" and "Custom Integrations Methods"

Overview Organization:

• auth module: Added "Features" and "Authentication Modes" subsections
• agents module: Added "Key Features", "Conversation Structure", "Authentication Modes", and "Generated Types" subsections
• analytics module: Added "Best Practices" and "Authentication Modes" subsections
• entities module: Added "Entity Handlers", "Built-in User Entity", and "Generated Types" subsections
• integrations module: Added "Integration Types" and "Authentication Modes" subsections
• functions, connectors, app-logs modules: Added "Authentication Modes" subsections

Terminology Updates:

• Updated custom integrations terminology to "custom workspace integrations" for clarity
• Added link to workspace integrations documentation

Test plan

• Generated docs locally and verified TOC structure
• Verified all modules have proper Overview organization
• Checked that methods are visible in TOC while deeper levels are hidden
• Confirmed type definitions are properly grouped
• Tested links and navigation

Made with Cursor

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

Code Review for PR #131: Improve SDK documentation TOC structure and organization

I've completed my review of the documentation improvements. Here's my detailed feedback:

Review Tasks:

• Analyze documentation processing script changes
• Review CSS modifications
• Check TypeScript type definition updates
• Assess overall code quality and best practices
• Look for potential bugs or issues
• Consider performance implications
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage

Code Quality and Best Practices ✅

The code demonstrates good practices overall:

• Excellent modularization: The 1800+ line processing script is well-organized into focused functions
• Clear naming conventions: Functions like groupIntroSections, mergeSectionWithMethods clearly describe their purpose
• Consistent error handling: Try-catch blocks appropriately handle file operations
• Good documentation: Functions have JSDoc comments explaining their purpose

Potential Issues and Improvements 🔍

1. Complex Regex Patterns (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js)

• Lines 194, 820, 1710: Complex regex patterns could be hard to maintain
• Recommendation: Consider adding more detailed comments explaining what each regex captures, or break complex patterns into smaller, named patterns

2. Hardcoded Magic Numbers

• Line 929: if (line.length > 85) - Consider making this configurable
• Line 135: Hardcoded timeout values could be constants
• Recommendation: Extract these to named constants at the top of the file

3. Potential Edge Cases

• Line 1184-1249: The groupIntroSections function assumes specific document structure
• Risk: May fail silently if document structure changes
• Recommendation: Add validation and warning logs for unexpected structures

4. String Manipulation Performance

• Multiple passes over content with string replacements (lines 195-228, 1120-1140)
• Impact: For large documentation files, multiple regex replacements could be slow
• Recommendation: Consider combining related replacements into single passes where possible

Performance Considerations 🚀

The implementation is generally performant, but there are optimization opportunities:

• File I/O: Good use of synchronous operations for build-time processing
• Memory usage: Loading entire files into memory is acceptable for documentation
• Suggestion: For very large documentation sets, consider streaming processing for the future

Security Review 🔒

No security concerns identified:

• ✅ No user input is processed without validation
• ✅ File paths are properly joined using path.join()
• ✅ No eval() or dynamic code execution
• ✅ No sensitive data handling

Test Coverage ⚠️

Main concern: No tests found for the documentation processing script

• The main processing file (file-processing.js) lacks unit tests
• Recommendation: Add tests for critical functions like:
  • cleanupSignatures
  • groupTypeDefinitions
  • mergeSectionWithMethods
  • Regex pattern matching functions

Example test structure:

describe('cleanupSignatures', () => {
  it('should replace truncated generics', () => {
    const input = 'Pick<..., ...>';
    const expected = 'Pick<T, K>';
    const result = cleanupSignatures(input);
    expect(result.content).toContain(expected);
  });
});

CSS Changes Review ✅

The CSS modifications are well-structured:

• Good use of CSS custom properties (var(--mint-text-secondary))
• Appropriate use of !important for override scenarios
• TOC visibility improvements are clean and targeted

TypeScript Documentation Comments 👍

Excellent improvements to type documentation:

• Clear JSDoc comments with examples
• Good use of @example tags
• Helpful descriptions for complex types

Summary

This PR makes substantial improvements to documentation organization and readability. The code quality is good, with opportunities for minor improvements around testing and maintainability. The changes are safe to merge, but I recommend adding tests for the documentation processing logic in a follow-up PR.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with suggestions for future improvements

[github-actions]

🚀 Package Preview Available!

---

Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i @base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.131.ff1af44

Prefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports @base44/sdk:

npm i "@base44/sdk@npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.131.ff1af44"

Or add it to your package.json dependencies:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@base44/sdk": "npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.131.ff1af44"
  }
}

• 📦 Preview Package: @base44-preview/sdk@0.8.19-pr.131.ff1af44
• 🔗 View this commit on GitHub

---

_{Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly!}