You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why is network_fine not used here (network_fn is used) after the depth-guided sampling for final rendering? The network_fine isn't used totally in the rendering process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, we do not use hierarchical sampling, so it is correct that there is just one network used. This is explained in the paper in section 3.2 in the paragraph on depth-guided sampling.
---Original---
From: "Barbara ***@***.***>
Date: Sun, Mar 12, 2023 18:11 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [barbararoessle/dense_depth_priors_nerf] About the depth-guidedray sampling (Issue #27)
Hi, we do not use hierarchical sampling, so it is correct that there is just one network used. This is explained in the paper in section 3.2 in the paragraph on depth-guided sampling.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
dense_depth_priors_nerf/run_nerf.py
Line 579 in d541ebe
Why is network_fine not used here (network_fn is used) after the depth-guided sampling for final rendering? The network_fine isn't used totally in the rendering process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: