Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed flakiness of the test BABEL-3592 by analysing appropriate tables #3117

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: BABEL_4_X_DEV
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Deepesh125
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This commit aims to fix flakiness of the test BABEL-3592 by analysing appropriate tables

Signed-off-by: Dipesh Dhameliya dddhamel@amazon.com

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and PostgreSQL licenses, and grant any person obtaining a copy of the contribution permission to relicense all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL License solely to contribute all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL open source project.

For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11831313904

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 74.658%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
contrib/babelfishpg_tds/src/backend/tds/tdscomm.c 2 76.03%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11818101440: -0.003%
Covered Lines: 45419
Relevant Lines: 60836

💛 - Coveralls

Recheck Cond: (b1 = 1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_babel_3592_t1_b1babel_35976c64b612d1f74e2768783beca3bf836
Index Cond: (b1 = 1)
-> Insert on babel_3592_t2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why there's still cost in here ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please set babelfishpg_tsql.explain_costs to off

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is experiment PR to understand difference

@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
# new line
# 6. If you want the framework to not run certain files, use: ignore#!#<test name>

all
# all
BABEL-3592
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forget to restore

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

THis is experimental PR

Recheck Cond: (b1 = 1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_babel_3592_t1_b1babel_35976c64b612d1f74e2768783beca3bf836
Index Cond: (b1 = 1)
-> Insert on babel_3592_t2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please set babelfishpg_tsql.explain_costs to off

test/JDBC/expected/BABEL-3592.out Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants