Skip to content

records: the 2KB decision is settled by what #266 shipped - #268

Merged
piwi3910 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
records/2kb-decision-settled
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

piwi3910 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
records/2kb-decision-settled

Conversation

@piwi3910

@piwi3910 piwi3910 commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The principles-hook truncation decision is marked decided (option 1: measure, then budget the delivery — what PR #266 implemented and merged). The answer is recorded in answers.md under its stable key, closing the last question on the queue; procoder ask now reports all 28 answered.

docs: none — decision and answer records in .procoder/ask/

The decision it was asking about — what to do about a 10KB
principles document arriving as a 2KB preview — was answered by
merging the fix: the delivery is now measured and budgeted, with the
receipt check pinned inside the inlined window. decisions.md carries
the Decided paragraph naming the option and the PR, and the answer is
recorded in answers.md under its stable key, which closes the last
question on the queue: procoder ask now reports all 28 answered.

docs: none — decision and answer records in .procoder/ask/
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 1, 2026 21:58

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The decision is marked “Decided” but still contains a lingering “(ask)” marker in the options list, which misrepresents it as open and should be removed for correctness/clarity.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

This PR records that the principles-hook truncation decision is settled (option 1: measure, then budget delivery as implemented in PR #266), updating the ask queue artifacts so the decision is clearly marked decided and its answer is stored under the stable key.

Changes:

  • Mark the decision as decided in .procoder/ask/decisions.md with a summary referencing PR #266.
  • Add the corresponding decision entry (stable key, context, and final answer) to .procoder/ask/answers.md and update the “Written …” timestamp.
File summaries
File Description
.procoder/ask/decisions.md Adds a “Decided” record to the relevant decision section to reflect the outcome from PR #266.
.procoder/ask/answers.md Records the decision under its stable key and updates the answers ledger timestamp.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread .procoder/ask/decisions.md Outdated
The review caught that the last option line still ended with (ask)
after the Decided paragraph — the marker is the tooling's signal for
an open question, and other decided sections in the file do not keep
it. Removing it; the Decided paragraph and the recorded answer carry
the settlement.

docs: none — it is a decision record in .procoder/ask/
The previous commit moved the file from the main tree, where the
Decided paragraph had not yet been committed, and dropped it with the
marker. Restoring it: a settlement without the settlement's text is
the same silence the record exists to end.

docs: none — it is a decision record in .procoder/ask/
The (ask) marker removal changed the question text, and the stable
key goes with its text: the answer recorded before the change keyed
against the old spelling, so the queue kept asking the question it
believed was new. Re-answered under the current key, and procoder ask
now reports all 28 answered — the queue is closed at zero.

docs: none — it is an answer record in .procoder/ask/
@piwi3910
piwi3910 merged commit 1c6a1fa into main Sep 1, 2026
11 checks passed
@piwi3910
piwi3910 deleted the records/2kb-decision-settled branch September 1, 2026 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants