Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/more predicates #783

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Feat/more predicates #783

merged 13 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Oct 14, 2024

Purpose

This PR mainly introduces some useful predicates for expressing governance rules.

json_read/2, json_write/3

Following PR #782, we can now introduce JSON readers and writers in stream mode.

Example:

cosmwasm_call(URI, Response) :-
  open(URI, 'read', Stream),
  json_read(Stream, Response),
  close(Stream).

atomic_list_concat/2 & atomic_list_concat/3

These predicates can be used for various concatenation needs, such as constructing URIs (with caution around encoding issues).

atomic_list_concat([
      'cosmwasm:',
      ContractName,
      ':',
      ContractAddr,
      '?query=',
      EncodedQuery,
      '&base64Decode=',
      DecodeBase64
], URI).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced predicates for term and atom manipulation, including term_to_atom, atomic_list_concat, JSONRead, and JSONWrite.
    • Added functionality for reading and writing terms to/from streams with ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3.
    • Enhanced JSON handling with improved error management and UTF-8 support.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved input stream handling in the ReadString function.
  • Tests

    • Added unit tests for new predicates and enhanced existing tests for JSON handling.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to reflect new features and changes in functionality.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.38424% with 52 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
x/logic/predicate/json.go 72.41% 24 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
x/logic/prolog/assert.go 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
x/logic/predicate/term.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #783      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.77%   43.28%   +0.51%     
==========================================
  Files         108      110       +2     
  Lines        5078     5205     +127     
==========================================
+ Hits         2172     2253      +81     
- Misses       2796     2828      +32     
- Partials      110      124      +14     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/logic/interpreter/registry.go 82.92% <ø> (ø)
x/logic/predicate/atom.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/logic/predicate/string.go 80.30% <100.00%> (-1.39%) ⬇️
x/logic/predicate/term.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/logic/prolog/assert.go 54.46% <0.00%> (-4.19%) ⬇️
x/logic/predicate/json.go 79.01% <72.41%> (-10.69%) ⬇️

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2024 08:33
@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Note

Reviews paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the interpreter and predicate packages within the logic module. The registry in the interpreter has been modified to map several predicates to their new implementations in the predicate package. New predicates for term and atom manipulation, as well as JSON handling, have been introduced. Additionally, unit tests for these new functionalities have been added to ensure correctness.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/logic/interpreter/registry.go Updated mappings for read_term/3 and write_term/3; added new entries for several predicates.
x/logic/predicate/atom.go Introduced predicates: TermToAtom, AtomicListConcat2, and AtomicListConcat3.
x/logic/predicate/atom_test.go Added unit tests for term_to_atom and atomic_list_concat predicates.
x/logic/predicate/json.go Added JSONRead and JSONWrite predicates; refactored JSONProlog and updated internal functions.
x/logic/predicate/json_test.go Added tests for JSONRead and JSONWrite; modified existing tests for UTF-8 handling.
x/logic/predicate/string.go Modified ReadString for better input stream handling; no changes to StringBytes.
x/logic/predicate/term.go Introduced WriteTerm3 and ReadTerm3 predicates for stream operations.
x/logic/prolog/assert.go Added AssertStream function for stream validation.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • bdeneux
  • amimart

Poem

In the logic realm where rabbits play,
New predicates hop in, brightening the day.
With atoms and JSON, they dance and they twirl,
A stream of new functions, watch them unfurl!
So let’s celebrate, with a hop and a cheer,
For changes that bring us all closer, my dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
x/logic/prolog/assert.go (1)

209-220: LGTM with a minor suggestion.

The AssertStream function is well-implemented and consistent with other assertion functions in this file. It correctly handles different cases and follows the established error handling patterns.

To improve consistency with other functions in this file, consider using a named return value for the error. This would make the function signature more aligned with functions like AssertAtom and AssertCharacterCode.

Here's a suggested modification to the function signature:

func AssertStream(stream engine.Term, env *engine.Env) (st *engine.Stream, err error) {
    // ... rest of the function remains the same
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 211-218: x/logic/prolog/assert.go#L211-L218
Added lines #L211 - L218 were not covered by tests

x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (1)

121-125: LGTM! New predicates align with PR objectives.

The newly added predicates (term_to_atom/2, atomic_list_concat/2, atomic_list_concat/3, json_read/2, and json_write/2) align well with the PR objectives, enhancing the system's capabilities for JSON handling and string manipulation.

Consider updating the package documentation to include information about these new predicates, their usage, and any potential caveats (e.g., encoding issues mentioned in the PR objectives for atomic_list_concat).

x/logic/predicate/atom_test.go (4)

26-87: Comprehensive test cases for term_to_atom.

The test cases cover a good range of scenarios:

  1. Error cases: instantiation errors and type errors.
  2. Various input types: atoms, integers, floats, strings.
  3. Edge cases: empty strings, negative numbers, scientific notation.

Consider adding a few more test cases:

  1. A very large integer or float to test potential overflow scenarios.
  2. A unicode string to ensure proper handling of non-ASCII characters.
  3. A compound term to verify how complex structures are handled.

90-140: Robust test execution and result validation.

The test execution and result validation are well-implemented:

  1. Each test case is run in isolation with a fresh context and interpreter.
  2. Error cases are properly checked and compared.
  3. Successful cases validate both the presence and content of the results.

One minor suggestion:
Consider extracting the result validation logic (lines 109-133) into a separate helper function to improve readability and reduce duplication, as this pattern is likely to be repeated in other test functions.


146-215: Comprehensive test cases for atomic_list_concat.

The test cases cover a good range of scenarios:

  1. Error cases: instantiation errors and type errors.
  2. Edge cases: empty lists, single-element lists.
  3. Various input types: atoms, numbers, strings.
  4. Different separators for the 3-argument version.

Consider adding a few more test cases:

  1. A case with a very long list to test potential performance issues.
  2. A case with unicode characters in the list elements and separator.
  3. A case where the separator is a multi-character string.

218-270: Consistent test execution and result validation.

The test execution and result validation are implemented consistently with TestTermToAtom:

  1. Each test case runs in isolation with a fresh context and interpreter.
  2. Both atomic_list_concat/2 and atomic_list_concat/3 are registered with the interpreter.
  3. Error cases and successful cases are properly validated.

As mentioned earlier, consider extracting the result validation logic (lines 238-262) into a separate helper function to improve readability and reduce duplication across test functions.

x/logic/predicate/atom.go (1)

81-113: Add unit tests for AtomicListConcat3 to cover edge cases

It's important to ensure that AtomicListConcat3 correctly handles various edge cases, such as empty lists, singleton lists, lists with non-atomic elements, and lists containing different types like integers and strings. Consider adding unit tests to cover these scenarios.

Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for these cases?

x/logic/predicate/json.go (3)

296-308: Expand error handling in prologErrorToException.

The prologErrorToException function translates Go errors into Prolog exceptions. Review the switch cases to ensure all relevant errors are correctly mapped, and consider adding any missing error types.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 298-299: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L298-L299
Added lines #L298 - L299 were not covered by tests


[warning] 304-305: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L304-L305
Added lines #L304 - L305 were not covered by tests


Line range hint 312-353: Validate token types in decodeJSONToTerm.

In the decodeJSONToTerm function, ensure that all possible JSON token types are appropriately handled. The default case currently returns an unexpected token error, but providing more specific error messages can aid in debugging.

Enhance the error message or handle additional token types if necessary.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 161-161: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L161
Added line #L161 was not covered by tests


[warning] 193-193: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L193
Added line #L193 was not covered by tests


[warning] 197-197: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L197
Added line #L197 was not covered by tests


[warning] 201-201: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L201
Added line #L201 was not covered by tests


[warning] 226-226: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L226
Added line #L226 was not covered by tests


[warning] 234-234: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L234
Added line #L234 was not covered by tests


[warning] 242-242: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L242
Added line #L242 was not covered by tests


[warning] 249-249: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L249
Added line #L249 was not covered by tests


[warning] 259-259: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests


[warning] 268-268: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L268
Added line #L268 was not covered by tests


[warning] 277-277: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests


[warning] 280-280: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L280
Added line #L280 was not covered by tests


[warning] 298-299: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L298-L299
Added lines #L298 - L299 were not covered by tests


[warning] 304-305: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L304-L305
Added lines #L304 - L305 were not covered by tests


386-411: Consolidate error handling in jsonErrorToException.

The jsonErrorToException function has overlapping error cases. Review and consolidate where possible to avoid redundancy, and ensure that all errors are providing clear and distinct messages.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 399-400: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L399-L400
Added lines #L399 - L400 were not covered by tests


[warning] 408-409: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L408-L409
Added lines #L408 - L409 were not covered by tests

x/logic/predicate/json_test.go (2)

725-782: Add test cases for successful execution of JSONRead

Currently, TestJSONRead includes only test cases that expect errors. Consider adding test cases that verify successful reading from valid text input streams to ensure correct functionality.


784-844: Add test cases for successful execution of JSONWrite

Similarly, TestJSONWrite focuses on error scenarios. Adding test cases that confirm successful writing to valid text output streams would enhance test coverage and validate proper behavior.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 025dd8b and ffbb692.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (28)
  • docs/predicate/atomic_list_concat_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/atomic_list_concat_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/bank_balances_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/bank_locked_balances_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/bank_spendable_balances_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/block_height_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/block_time_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/chain_id_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/consult_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/crypto_data_hash_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/current_output_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/did_components_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/ecdsa_verify_4.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/eddsa_verify_4.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/hex_bytes_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/json_prolog_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/json_read_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/json_write_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/open_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/open_4.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/read_string_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/read_term_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/source_file_1.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/string_bytes_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/term_to_atom_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/uri_encoded_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
  • docs/predicate/write_term_3.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/atom.go (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/atom_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/json.go (6 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/json_test.go (5 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/string.go (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/term.go (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/prolog/assert.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/logic/predicate/json.go

[warning] 161-161: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L161
Added line #L161 was not covered by tests


[warning] 193-193: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L193
Added line #L193 was not covered by tests


[warning] 197-197: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L197
Added line #L197 was not covered by tests


[warning] 201-201: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L201
Added line #L201 was not covered by tests


[warning] 226-226: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L226
Added line #L226 was not covered by tests


[warning] 234-234: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L234
Added line #L234 was not covered by tests


[warning] 242-242: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L242
Added line #L242 was not covered by tests


[warning] 249-249: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L249
Added line #L249 was not covered by tests


[warning] 259-259: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests


[warning] 268-268: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L268
Added line #L268 was not covered by tests


[warning] 277-277: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests


[warning] 280-280: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L280
Added line #L280 was not covered by tests


[warning] 298-299: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L298-L299
Added lines #L298 - L299 were not covered by tests


[warning] 304-305: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L304-L305
Added lines #L304 - L305 were not covered by tests


[warning] 353-353: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L353
Added line #L353 was not covered by tests


[warning] 399-400: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L399-L400
Added lines #L399 - L400 were not covered by tests


[warning] 408-409: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L408-L409
Added lines #L408 - L409 were not covered by tests


[warning] 436-436: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L436
Added line #L436 was not covered by tests


[warning] 446-446: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L446
Added line #L446 was not covered by tests


[warning] 466-466: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L466
Added line #L466 was not covered by tests

x/logic/predicate/term.go

[warning] 25-26: x/logic/predicate/term.go#L25-L26
Added lines #L25 - L26 were not covered by tests


[warning] 45-46: x/logic/predicate/term.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests

x/logic/prolog/assert.go

[warning] 211-218: x/logic/prolog/assert.go#L211-L218
Added lines #L211 - L218 were not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (15)
x/logic/predicate/string.go (3)

41-43: Improved stream handling and validation

The use of prolog.AssertStream is a good improvement. It simplifies error handling and stream validation, making the code more robust and easier to maintain.


54-54: Consistent variable usage

The change from s to is for reading runes is consistent with the new stream handling introduced earlier. This improves code consistency and readability.


Line range hint 1-180: Overall assessment: Improved code quality and consistency

The changes in this file, particularly in the ReadString function, enhance error handling and maintain code consistency. The use of prolog.AssertStream for stream validation is a notable improvement. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the expression of governance rules within the codebase.

x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (2)

70-71: Ensure comprehensive testing and documentation updates.

The changes to existing predicates and the addition of new ones significantly enhance the system's capabilities. To maintain the robustness and usability of the system:

  1. Ensure that comprehensive tests are in place for both the modified and new predicates.
  2. Update any API documentation or user guides to reflect these changes.
  3. Review and update any code examples or tutorials that might be affected by these changes.

To verify the test coverage for the new and modified predicates, you can run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for test coverage of new and modified predicates

# Test: Search for test functions related to the new and modified predicates
rg --type go -e 'func Test.*(?:ReadTerm3?|WriteTerm3?|TermToAtom|AtomicListConcat|JSONRead|JSONWrite)' --glob 'x/logic/**/*_test.go'

Also applies to: 121-125


70-71: Verify compatibility of new predicate implementations.

The implementations for read_term/3 and write_term/3 have been changed from engine.ReadTerm and engine.WriteTerm to predicate.ReadTerm3 and predicate.WriteTerm3 respectively. Please ensure that these new implementations maintain backwards compatibility and adhere to the expected behavior of these predicates.

To verify the compatibility, you can run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

Further investigation required to locate ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 implementations.

To ensure that the new implementations exist and are correctly positioned within the predicate package, please run the following script:

shell
#!/bin/bash

Description: Search for implementations of ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 across the entire codebase

Using ast-grep for precise function definition matching

ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ReadTerm3($, $, $) { $$$ }' .
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func WriteTerm3($
, $, $) { $$$ }' .


Further investigation required to locate ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 implementations.

Please run the following script to search for the implementations of ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 across the entire codebase:

shell
#!/bin/bash

Description: Search for implementations of ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 across the entire codebase.

Using ripgrep to find function definitions

rg --type go 'func ReadTerm3' .
rg --type go 'func WriteTerm3' .


Retry searching for ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 implementations.

Please run the following script to locate the definitions of these functions across the entire codebase:


Verified: ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 implementations are correctly located in the predicate package.

The functions ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 have been successfully moved to x/logic/predicate/term.go and are properly referenced in the registry. This ensures that the new implementations maintain backwards compatibility and adhere to the expected behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the implementations of ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 in the engine and predicate packages

# Test: Check for the existence and compare the implementations
rg --type go -e 'func ReadTerm3?' -e 'func WriteTerm3?' --glob 'x/logic/{engine,predicate}/*.go'

Length of output: 405


Script:

Length of output: 98


Script:

Length of output: 98


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for implementations of ReadTerm3 and WriteTerm3 across the entire codebase.

# Using ripgrep to find function definitions
rg --type go 'func ReadTerm3' .
rg --type go 'func WriteTerm3' .

Length of output: 363

x/logic/predicate/atom_test.go (3)

24-142: Well-structured and comprehensive test function for term_to_atom.

The TestTermToAtom function is well-organized and follows good testing practices:

  1. It uses a table-driven test approach, which allows for easy addition of new test cases.
  2. The test cases cover a wide range of scenarios, including error cases and edge cases.
  3. The use of GoConvey provides a clear and readable structure for the tests.
  4. The test setup with an in-memory database and light interpreter ensures good isolation for each test case.

144-271: Well-structured test function for atomic_list_concat.

The TestAtomicListConcat function follows the same good practices as TestTermToAtom:

  1. It uses a table-driven test approach for easy expansion.
  2. The test cases cover both atomic_list_concat/2 and atomic_list_concat/3 variants.
  3. The use of GoConvey and the test setup are consistent with the previous function, maintaining a good testing pattern throughout the file.

1-271: Overall, excellent test coverage with minor suggestions for improvement.

This test file demonstrates high-quality unit testing for the term_to_atom and atomic_list_concat predicates. The use of table-driven tests, GoConvey framework, and consistent test patterns across functions contributes to maintainable and extensible tests.

Suggestions for further improvement:

  1. Refactor the common result validation logic into a shared helper function to reduce duplication.
  2. Add a few more edge cases as suggested in the individual function reviews.
  3. Consider adding benchmarks for these predicates, especially for atomic_list_concat with large inputs, to ensure performance characteristics.
x/logic/predicate/term.go (1)

1-47: Implementations delegate correctly to the engine package.

Both WriteTerm3 and ReadTerm3 functions appropriately delegate to engine.WriteTerm and engine.ReadTerm, ensuring consistency and reuse of existing logic.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 25-26: x/logic/predicate/term.go#L25-L26
Added lines #L25 - L26 were not covered by tests


[warning] 45-46: x/logic/predicate/term.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests

x/logic/predicate/atom.go (1)

91-93: Ensure correct handling of empty lists

In the base case when the list is empty, the function unifies atom with prolog.AtomEmpty, representing an empty atom. Please verify that this behavior aligns with the expected outcome for atomic_list_concat/3 when given an empty list.

x/logic/predicate/json.go (2)

420-475: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure UTF-8 encoding is correctly handled in stream readers and writers.

In the textStreamDecoder and textStreamWriter, verify that all edge cases related to UTF-8 encoding and decoding are correctly managed to prevent data corruption or panics.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 436-436: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L436
Added line #L436 was not covered by tests


[warning] 446-446: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L446
Added line #L446 was not covered by tests


[warning] 466-466: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L466
Added line #L466 was not covered by tests


156-184: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Handle unexpected term types in encodeTermToJSON.

The encodeTermToJSON function should gracefully handle unexpected term types to prevent runtime errors. Currently, some cases may not be fully covered.

Consider adding explicit handling or error messages for unsupported term types, such as:

 default:
+	return engine.TypeError(prolog.AtomTypeJSON, term, env)
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 161-161: x/logic/predicate/json.go#L161
Added line #L161 was not covered by tests

x/logic/predicate/json_test.go (3)

5-9: Necessary imports added for new functionality

The added imports (bytes, context, regexp, strings) are appropriate and required for the new test cases.


277-284: Test case added for UTF-8 string conversion

Great job adding a test case to verify UTF-8 string handling in json_prolog. This ensures correct parsing and serialization of Unicode characters.


513-513: Registering the json_read predicate

Registering json_read with the interpreter ensures that the new predicate is available for use in tests. This is essential for testing its functionality.

x/logic/prolog/assert.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/term.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/term.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/atom.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/atom.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/json.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/json.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/json.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/json_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/logic/predicate/json_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Oct 14, 2024

@coderabbitai pause

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Reviews paused.

Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice set of tools, I'm eager to play with them 😉

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 5e9b7b5 into main Oct 16, 2024
20 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the feat/more-predicates branch October 16, 2024 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants