Skip to content

fix: rename to lambda-tool-mcp-server #447

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

scottschreckengaust
Copy link
Member

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust commented May 29, 2025

Summary

Changing the awslabs.lambda-mcp-server to awslabs.lambda-tool-mcp-server

Changes

Please provide a summary of what's being changed

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

  • I have reviewed the contributing guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of this change
  • Changes have been tested
  • Changes are documented

Is this a breaking change? (Y/N)

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the project license.

Signed-off-by: Scott Schreckengaust <scottschreckengaust@users.noreply.github.com>
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust added the hold-merging Signals to hold the PR from merging label May 29, 2025
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

bx9900
bx9900 previously approved these changes May 29, 2025
theagenticguy
theagenticguy previously approved these changes May 29, 2025
@theagenticguy theagenticguy dismissed stale reviews from bx9900 and themself via e693710 May 29, 2025 17:00
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.75%. Comparing base (ccdc184) to head (5be3ff9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.87%   80.75%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         263      254       -9     
  Lines       18096    17619     -477     
  Branches     2750     2664      -86     
==========================================
- Hits        14636    14228     -408     
+ Misses       2592     2537      -55     
+ Partials      868      854      -14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust removed the hold-merging Signals to hold the PR from merging label May 29, 2025
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust merged commit fa9225d into main May 29, 2025
146 checks passed
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust deleted the fix/rename-lambda-mcp-server branch May 29, 2025 17:49
tenzingsherpaa pushed a commit to tenzingsherpaa/mcp that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Signed-off-by: Scott Schreckengaust <scottschreckengaust@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Laith Al-Saadoon <9553966+theagenticguy@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants