-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(jmespath): rename jmespath parsing options type #2367
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
boring-cyborg
bot
added
the
idempotency
This item relates to the Idempotency Utility
label
Apr 16, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
the
enhancement
PRs that introduce minor changes, usually to existing features
label
Apr 16, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
github-actions
bot
added
do-not-merge
This item should not be merged
need-issue
This PR needs an issue before it can be reviewed/worked on further
labels
Apr 16, 2024
2 tasks
boring-cyborg
bot
added
automation
This item relates to automation
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
layers
Items related to the Lambda Layers pipeline
dependencies
Changes that touch dependencies, e.g. Dependabot, etc.
internal
PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)
tests
PRs that add or change tests
labels
Apr 16, 2024
pull-request-size
bot
added
size/L
PRs between 100-499 LOC
and removed
size/M
PR between 30-99 LOC
labels
Apr 16, 2024
dreamorosi
force-pushed
the
refactor/jmespath_parsing_options
branch
from
April 16, 2024 15:55
792cded
to
785bcad
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
am29d
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks much cleaner and more accessible now.
dreamorosi
removed
do-not-merge
This item should not be merged
need-issue
This PR needs an issue before it can be reviewed/worked on further
labels
Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
automation
This item relates to automation
dependencies
Changes that touch dependencies, e.g. Dependabot, etc.
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
enhancement
PRs that introduce minor changes, usually to existing features
idempotency
This item relates to the Idempotency Utility
internal
PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)
layers
Items related to the Lambda Layers pipeline
size/M
PR between 30-99 LOC
tests
PRs that add or change tests
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
This PR renames the
ParsingOptions
type present in the JMESPath utility toJMESPathParsingOptions
for clarity.This change was made so that usages across other packages (i.e. Idempotency) are clearer on what these options refer to.
Related issues, RFCs
Issue number: #2369
Checklist
Breaking change checklist
Is it a breaking change?: NO
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.