-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(logger): remove logEvent from required settings #1821
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than removing the
sampleRateValue
from here I would instead change the wording above to remove the "required" mention entirely.My reasoning here is that none of the settings is really required since they all have defaults and they are all typed as such.
So to sum up I'd change the first sentence from what it is now to something along the lines of:
The logger accepts three settings.
or something similar.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My goal was to align it with python docs and have a dedicated section for env variables.
I think the confusion comes from the phrase 'or pass them in the constructor' and because we mix environment variables and constructor settings, which overlap with exceptions. So if we keep three ENVs that are also part of the constructor people might assume that the other constructor values are missing from the docs.
We could add additional deep link to API docs to the constructor. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think having a section to the env variables or linking to the existing one in the main page is great.
I was mainly arguing against the "required" wording which is really not true, and at the same time wanting to have a place to get started quickly.
As a user I want to read at the very top of the page how to get started using the library either because I don't know or remember it. Having all the applicable settings surfaced early is useful and we have evidence that customers are doing this (we had multiple reports about
logEvent
being out of place here).I'm in favor of deep linking the API docs and making the wording clearer if needed, but I wouldn't remove the parameter from here.