ISSUE-158: Fix CompletableFuture jsonb generation #160
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
February 14, 2023 19:42
…le values if no other endpoints are defined with the same return type.
LoonyRules
changed the title
rbygrave
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to #159 but with a slightly different approach. I decided after some more time with the code that it'd be best to update
jsonTypeswhen it's being generated rather than having the dodgy if statements when we iterate through thejsonTypes.values().I do like the
UType.isCFuture()definition though as it creates a better standardisation.Thoughts?
Fixes #158