Skip to content

Conversation

qdm12
Copy link
Contributor

@qdm12 qdm12 commented Mar 7, 2025

Why this should be merged

Final changes that will be squashed into the libevm branch, suggested from the PR review of #820

This also notably contains:

Let me know if you want me to split this PR, that's no problem as well.

How this works

  • Each line changed has a corresponding resolved conversation on chore(all): libevm phase 2.5 #820 which you can check by finding the same file/line number in the files changed
  • Commits with revert means the code is reverted to how it is on the master branch because the change is actually not needed.

You can compare this branch to master here as well, for example to check on reversion changes.

How this was tested

Need to be documented?

Need to update RELEASES.md?

@qdm12 qdm12 mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2025
1 task
@qdm12 qdm12 changed the title chore(all): final changes to the libevm branch chore(all): final small changes to the libevm branch Mar 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@alarso16 alarso16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@qdm12 qdm12 force-pushed the qdm12/libevm-last-changes branch 2 times, most recently from b9073f0 to 2c501ed Compare March 24, 2025 14:57
qdm12 added 20 commits March 28, 2025 07:56
…multicoin balance

Signed-off-by: Quentin McGaw <quentin.mcgaw@gmail.com>
@qdm12 qdm12 force-pushed the qdm12/libevm-last-changes branch from 1c6b47f to 8b5354b Compare March 28, 2025 07:03
@qdm12
Copy link
Contributor Author

qdm12 commented Mar 28, 2025

No-op force push due to a missing signature 🤷

@qdm12 qdm12 merged commit 8f7795f into libevm Mar 28, 2025
6 checks passed
@qdm12 qdm12 deleted the qdm12/libevm-last-changes branch March 28, 2025 07:19
qdm12 added a commit to ava-labs/subnet-evm that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
Changes applied from comments on the review of ava-labs/coreth#820

See original PR ava-labs/coreth#862

Signed-off-by: Quentin McGaw <quentin.mcgaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Arran Schlosberg <519948+ARR4N@users.noreply.github.com>
@ARR4N
Copy link
Collaborator

ARR4N commented Mar 28, 2025

No-op force push due to a missing signature 🤷

Even "no-op" force pushes can break other people's workflows. Just GPG-sign everything.

By definition there can never be a completely no-op force push. While it may not change the file tree, it will change the commit history, and that's what GitHub relies on. If it was a no-op then a force push would be unnecessary.

qdm12 added a commit to ava-labs/subnet-evm that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Changes applied from comments on the review of ava-labs/coreth#820

See original PR ava-labs/coreth#862

Signed-off-by: Quentin McGaw <quentin.mcgaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Arran Schlosberg <519948+ARR4N@users.noreply.github.com>
node-druidx56y added a commit to node-druidx56y/subnet-evm that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2025
Changes applied from comments on the review of ava-labs/coreth#820

See original PR ava-labs/coreth#862

Signed-off-by: Quentin McGaw <quentin.mcgaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Arran Schlosberg <519948+ARR4N@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants