Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tier4_perception_launch): fix duplicated topic name #3645

Conversation

badai-nguyen
Copy link
Contributor

@badai-nguyen badai-nguyen commented May 9, 2023

Description

This PR fixes the duplicated name topics which are used in camera_lidar_radar_fusion mode.

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned) label May 9, 2023
@badai-nguyen badai-nguyen marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2023 02:48
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
<include file="$(find-pkg-share object_merger)/launch/object_association_merger.launch.xml">
<arg name="input/object0" value="$(var merger/input/objects)"/>
<arg name="input/object1" value="clustering/camera_lidar_fusion/objects"/>
<arg name="output/object" value="camera_lidar_fusion/objects"/>
<arg name="output/object" value="camera_lidar_fusion/objects_without_tracker"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about "$(var lidar_detection_model)_cluster_fusion/objects"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@miursh since it is result of roi, cluster and lidar_detection_model, so how about "$(var lidar_detection_model)_roi_cluster_fusion/objects"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@miursh I renamed topic here bd9a1e8

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.87 🎉

Comparison is base (ce1255a) 13.82% compared to head (98b582a) 14.69%.

❗ Current head 98b582a differs from pull request most recent head bd9a1e8. Consider uploading reports for the commit bd9a1e8 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3645      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   13.82%   14.69%   +0.87%     
==========================================
  Files        1395     1297      -98     
  Lines       98083    92234    -5849     
  Branches    29155    29155              
==========================================
- Hits        13556    13555       -1     
+ Misses      69872    64023    -5849     
- Partials    14655    14656       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential ∅ <ø> (?)
total 14.69% <ø> (+0.87%) ⬆️ Carriedforward from ce1255a

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

see 100 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@miursh miursh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
image

@badai-nguyen badai-nguyen merged commit 5d1b464 into autowarefoundation:main May 9, 2023
@badai-nguyen badai-nguyen deleted the fix/camera_lidar_radar_fusion_launch branch June 1, 2023 14:18
badai-nguyen added a commit to badai-nguyen/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
…dation#3645)

* fix(tier4_perception_launch): fix dublicated topic name

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename topic

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

---------

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
shmpwk pushed a commit to tier4/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
…dation#3645) (#586)

* fix(tier4_perception_launch): fix dublicated topic name



* chore: rename topic



---------

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
badai-nguyen added a commit to badai-nguyen/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2023
…dation#3645)

* fix(tier4_perception_launch): fix dublicated topic name

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename topic

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

---------

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
badai-nguyen added a commit to badai-nguyen/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
…dation#3645)

* fix(tier4_perception_launch): fix dublicated topic name

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename topic

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>

---------

Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants