Skip to content

Conversation

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Standardized the color scheme for technology and language tags for a more cohesive visual presentation.
  • New Features

    • Refined the AsyncAPI tool listings with updated names, descriptions, links, and filtering options to enhance user navigation and clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request makes cosmetic and configuration updates. In the config/all-tags.json file, the JSON content is completely replaced to standardize color codes for various technology entries. In the config/tools-automated.json file, several tool entries undergo a series of replacements and reversion changes that update titles, descriptions, links, and filters. No new entries are added or removed; the modifications are limited to altering the visual presentation and descriptive metadata of existing entries.

Changes

File Change Summary
config/all-tags.json Replaced entire JSON content to update and standardize color codes (bg-[#61d0f2], border-[#40ccf7]) for multiple technology and language entries without altering keys or entry counts.
config/tools-automated.json Modified several tool entries by swapping titles, descriptions, links, and filter attributes. Specific tools (e.g., AsyncAPI.Net, nestjs-asyncapi, asyncapi-python/Golang AsyncAPI Code Generator, Zod Sockets/Glee, AsyncAPI Diff/jasyncapicmp, ZenWave SDK/AsyncAPI CLI, Node.js Multiprotocol Template/Java Template, HTML Template/Java Spring Cloud Stream Template) were replaced and then reverted back to update their metadata.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

autoapproved, autoupdate

Suggested reviewers

  • derberg
  • akshatnema
  • anshgoyalevil
  • sambhavgupta0705
  • Mayaleeeee
  • devilkiller-ag
  • asyncapi-bot-eve

Poem

I hopped through lines of code today,
Changing colors in a playful display.
Tools danced and themes aligned,
In JSON patterns so refined.
With a twitch of my whiskers and a nimble leap,
I bring fresh hues for our code to keep!
🐇✨ Happy hops ahead!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f42e537) to head (81d684c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3993   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          667       667           
  Branches       113       113           
=========================================
  Hits           667       667           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 81d684c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67e9e3f7fa645e000843797c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3993--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit d1689f7 into master Mar 31, 2025
31 of 34 checks passed
@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot deleted the update-tools/regenerateTools branch March 31, 2025 00:42
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (5)
config/tools-automated.json (5)

1413-1431: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate “Java Template” Entry
A duplicate Java Template appears with the same inconsistency in the language array.
Action: In addition to deduplication, please address the language mismatch as noted above.


1433-1453: ⚠️ Potential issue

“Java Spring Template” Entry – Language Field Check
This block for "Java Spring Template" again lists the "language" as an array with "javascript", yet the description indicates it is a Java Spring template.
Recommendation: Revisit the language filter (perhaps it should be "Java" or include both if hybrid) to avoid confusion.


1606-1625: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate “Java Spring Cloud Stream Template” Entry
The duplicate of the previous entry carries the same language field concern.
Action: Address duplication and update the language specification as needed.


1585-1604: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

First “Java Spring Cloud Stream Template” Entry
This entry uses "language": ["javascript"], yet it is a Java Spring Cloud Stream template.
Critical Issue: The language filter is likely misconfigured. Please verify if the language should be "Java" (or a different appropriate value) rather than "javascript".


Critical: Update Language Filter for Java Template

The "Java Spring Cloud Stream Template" entry in config/tools-automated.json incorrectly specifies "language": ["javascript"]. Given that the title, description, and repository URL indicate this is a Java-based template, please update the language filter to "Java" (or the appropriate Java identifier) to ensure consistency.

  • File: config/tools-automated.json
  • Lines: 1585-1604
  • Action: Change "language": ["javascript"] to "language": ["Java"]

1393-1411: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

First “Java Template” Entry
This tool now titled "Java Template" includes a repo URL for the Java template but its filter for "language" is provided as an array with "javascript".
Critical Issue: The mismatch between the template name (Java) and the language filter ("javascript") is concerning. Please verify and update the language field to reflect the correct technology (e.g. "Java") if this is an error.


Critical: Mismatch in Language Filter for “Java Template”
In file config/tools-automated.json (lines 1393-1411), the tool titled "Java Template" incorrectly lists "javascript" under its language filter. Given that the template is for Java (as also indicated by the "technology": ["Java"] filter and the repository URL), please update the language field to "Java" (or an appropriate Java-related identifier) to maintain consistency.
File: config/tools-automated.json
Issue Location: Lines 1393-1411
Required Change: Update "language": ["javascript"] to "language": ["Java"]

🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
config/all-tags.json (1)

1-75: Standardizing Color Codes & Duplicate Check
The entire JSON has been replaced to standardize the color codes for both languages and technologies. The new values (for example, changing the TypeScript entry to use bg-[#61d0f2] and border-[#40ccf7]) are applied uniformly.
Action: Verify that these new color codes align with the brand/design guidelines.
Note: There appear to be duplicate entries for some items (e.g. multiple "TypeScript" entries or repeated updates for other technologies). Confirm that duplicates are intentional rather than accidental.

config/tools-automated.json (14)

117-134: New “nestjs-asyncapi” Entry – Language Capitalization
A new tool entry with title "nestjs-asyncapi" has been added. The description, repository link, and filter settings (with technology values "Node.js" and "NestJS") look correct.
Suggestion: The filter field "language": "Typescript" uses a different capitalization than the more common "TypeScript". Consider standardizing this while comparing with other entries.


270-287: First “asyncapi-python” Entry – Language Consistency
The tool "asyncapi-python" now points to a GitHub repo and PyPI link, with filters using "language": "python" and technology ["amqp"].
Recommendation: For consistency with other language entries (e.g. “Python” elsewhere), consider capitalizing to "Python".


289-306: Duplicate “asyncapi-python” Entry
A subsequent block repeats the "asyncapi-python" entry with identical details.
Action: Confirm if the duplicate is intentional (for example, if the tool is meant to appear in two lists) or if one should be removed to avoid redundancy.


308-321: First “Golang AsyncAPI Code Generator” Entry
This entry for the Go code generator is updated with its repo URL and filters using "language": "golang".
Suggestion: Consider whether you want to standardize the language naming—for example, using "Go" or "Golang" consistently across the configuration.


322-336: Duplicate “Golang AsyncAPI Code Generator” Entry
A second, identical block for the Go code generator appears immediately after.
Action: Verify that duplicating this entry is intentional.


697-712: Duplicate “Glee” Entry
A duplicate of the "Glee" tool is present with identical settings.
Action: Ensure that multiple entries for “Glee” are intended. If not, consider deduplicating.


737-757: Duplicate “Zod Sockets” Entry
A second block replicates the "Zod Sockets" tool with identical attributes.
Action: Confirm that this duplicate is required for the document’s organization.


1039-1057: Duplicate “jasyncapicmp” Entry
A nearly identical duplicate follows.
Action: Reevaluate whether both entries are necessary.


1157-1174: Duplicate “AsyncAPI CLI” Block with Fork Link
Another block duplicates the CLI entry with the same fork details.
Action: Check if the repeated CLI entries are needed or if consolidation is possible.


1202-1226: Duplicate “ZenWave SDK” Entry in CLIs
A duplicate entry for "ZenWave SDK" follows immediately.
Action: Verify if both entries should exist. If not, consider removing the duplicate.


1477-1493: First “HTML Template” Entry
The "HTML Template" entry is updated with its repo URL and proper filters.
Observation: The language still appears as "javascript" while the technology is "HTML". Confirm that this is the intended classification.


1495-1511: Duplicate “HTML Template” Entry
A second block for the HTML Template repeats the earlier entry.
Action: If duplicates are not desired, consider removing one instance.


1531-1547: Duplicate “Node.js Multiprotocol Template” Entry
A near duplicate follows immediately; please confirm whether this redundancy is required.


1567-1583: Duplicate “Node.js Websockets Template” Entry
A duplicate block of the Websockets Template appears; double-check duplication intent.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f42e537 and 81d684c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/all-tags.json (1 hunks)
  • config/tools-automated.json (23 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Automerge PR autoapproved by a bot
  • GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI
🔇 Additional comments (8)
config/tools-automated.json (8)

136-156: Reinstated “AsyncAPI.Net” Entry
This block reinstates the "AsyncAPI.Net" tool with its .NET details. The URLs and filters (with language "C#") are properly specified.
Action: Double-check that this reinstatement fits the overall strategy and that there is no conflict with the new entries.


681-696: First “Glee” Entry (Frameworks Section)
The tool "Glee" now appears with its repo URL and a filter listing "technology": ["TypeScript"]. The property "isAsyncAPIOwner": true is set.
Note: As there is no explicit language field here, confirm that this lack is acceptable for frameworks.


715-735: First “Zod Sockets” Entry (Frameworks Section)
This block for "Zod Sockets" updates the links and filters. The "language": "TypeScript" setting is used and the technology array includes both "Node.js" and "TypeScript".
Observation: The values look correct; please verify that the inclusion of both Node.js and TypeScript in technology is deliberate.


1019-1037: First “jasyncapicmp” (Compare tools Section)
For the tool now titled "jasyncapicmp", the description, links, and filter using "language": "Java" with technology ["Maven"] look correct.
Note: The property "isAsyncAPIOwner": false is explicitly set; ensure this is accurate.


1138-1155: First “AsyncAPI CLI” Entry – Fork Update
The entry for "AsyncAPI CLI" now points to a fork at "https://github.com/hkirat/asyncapi-fork". The description remains unchanged.
Question: Is this fork meant to replace the original? Confirm that the fork’s repository is the intended target for users.


1176-1200: First “ZenWave SDK” in CLIs Section
The "ZenWave SDK" entry appears here with updated links and filters (language "Java" and technology including "Maven", "CLI", "Spring Cloud Streams", and "JHipster JDL").
Observation: If this SDK is being reclassified under CLIs, ensure that this move is coordinated with related documentation.


1513-1529: First “Node.js Multiprotocol Template” Entry
This entry for the Node.js Multiprotocol Template appears correct with "language": "javascript" and technology "Node.js".


1549-1565: First “Node.js Websockets Template” Entry
The Websockets Template entry looks well formed with "language": "javascript" and appropriate technology.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants