Skip to content

Conversation

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Refined the visual presentation by unifying the color scheme for language and technology badges.
  • New Features

    • Expanded and restructured our tools collection with new and updated entries across APIs, Code-first tools, CLIs, IDE Extensions, and generator templates, enhancing clarity and relevance to current technologies.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates two configuration files. In config/all-tags.json, the entire JSON content is replaced and the “color” and “borderColor” attributes for multiple programming languages and technologies are standardized to a uniform scheme (bg-[#61d0f2] and border-[#40ccf7]), and a trailing newline is removed. In config/tools-automated.json, several tool entries are added, replaced, or modified across sections (APIs, Code-first tools, CLIs, IDE Extensions, AsyncAPI Generator Templates) with updated descriptions, links, and filters. There are no changes to exported or public entity declarations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
config/all-tags.json Entire JSON replaced; updated “color” and “borderColor” values to bg-[#61d0f2] and border-[#40ccf7] across entries; trailing newline removed.
config/tools-automated.json Multiple entries added or modified across APIs, Code-first tools, CLIs, IDE Extensions, and AsyncAPI Generator Templates; descriptions, links, and filters updated.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

autoapproved, autoupdate

Suggested reviewers

  • derberg
  • akshatnema
  • magicmatatjahu
  • sambhavgupta0705
  • anshgoyalevil
  • Mayaleeeee
  • devilkiller-ag
  • asyncapi-bot-eve

Poem

I'm a rabbit in the code lane,
Hopping through changes with a joyful refrain,
Colors now gleam in a uniform light,
Tools updated, making configurations bright,
Each line of JSON sings its own tune,
Coding leaps like a bunny under the moon!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 576835f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67e0a92697eb3d0008d82748
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3953--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (16491f6) to head (576835f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3953   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          667       667           
  Branches       113       113           
=========================================
  Hits           667       667           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit e09b194 into master Mar 24, 2025
32 of 34 checks passed
@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot deleted the update-tools/regenerateTools branch March 24, 2025 00:40
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
config/tools-automated.json (5)

5-44: Duplicate API Entries Detected
The "APIs" section contains two identical entries for "AsyncAPI Server API" (lines 5–24 and 25–44). Please verify whether this duplication is intentional or if a single consolidated entry would suffice.


91-137: Duplicate Entries in Code-first Tools
Within the "Code-first tools" section, the "AsyncAPI.Net" tool appears twice with identical details (around lines 95–115 and 117–137). Confirm if both entries are required; if not, consolidating them may reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.


1097-1228: Duplicate Entries in CLIs Section
There are multiple identical entries for "AsyncAPI CLI" as well as repeated entries for "ZenWave SDK" in this section (approximately lines 1099–1228). Please check if these duplicates serve a specific purpose (e.g. different configurations) or if they should be consolidated to avoid clutter in the tools list.


1271-1314: Duplicate IDE Extension Entries
The "IDE Extensions" section now features two identical entries for "jAsyncAPI - IDEA plugin" (around lines 1274–1293 and 1295–1314). If these duplicates are not meant to represent different variations, please consider keeping a single entry for clarity.


1389-1627: Multiple Duplicate Template Entries
In the "AsyncAPI Generator Templates" section, several templates (e.g. "Node.js Multiprotocol Template", "Java Spring Template", "Node.js Websockets Template", etc.) appear more than once with identical information. Verify that each duplicate is intentional (for instance, to support variations or legacy references); if not, consolidating duplicates could improve the clarity and efficiency of this configuration.

config/all-tags.json (1)

1-1: Uniform Color Scheme Update with Duplicate Considerations
The update applies the uniform color scheme (bg-[#61d0f2] and border-[#40ccf7]) consistently across both the "languages" and "technologies" arrays. However, multiple entries (e.g., "TypeScript", "Socket.IO", "HTML", among others) appear repeated. Please verify that these duplicates are intentional for your tagging strategy; if not, reducing redundancy might simplify maintenance and display.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16491f6 and 576835f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/all-tags.json (1 hunks)
  • config/tools-automated.json (20 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Automerge PR autoapproved by a bot
  • GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13
🔇 Additional comments (2)
config/tools-automated.json (1)

1-1709: Overall JSON Structure and Uniform Styling
The JSON structure is valid, and it is clear that a uniform color scheme (bg-[#61d0f2] with border-[#40ccf7]) is intentionally applied to various technology entries. Please double-check that all duplicate entries across sections (APIs, Code-first tools, CLIs, IDE Extensions, Templates, etc.) are indeed intended, as redundant items could negatively affect the user interface or data management.

config/all-tags.json (1)

1-1: JSON Formatting Consistency
The file maintains consistent JSON formatting with the removal of the trailing newline as intended. This enhances visual consistency across the project configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants