Skip to content

Conversation

@Shurtu-gal
Copy link
Contributor

@Shurtu-gal Shurtu-gal commented Mar 18, 2025

Update automerge file.

Successful run: https://github.com/Shurtu-gal/action-test-bed/actions/runs/13926437541/job/38972102113?pr=4

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced automation alerts now provide clear, actionable messages when critical commit details are missing, ensuring that users receive timely notifications and guidance during workflow execution.
  • New Features

    • Improved commit processing reliably aggregates and displays contributor information, enabling accurate co-author recognition and seamless reporting of collaborative contributions, thereby enhancing overall workflow reliability and user satisfaction.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates a GitHub Actions workflow by adding enhanced error handling and logic modifications. The workflow now checks for an empty commit list and sets an appropriate failure message when no commits or authors are found. It extracts unique authors from the commits—mapping usernames to their names and emails—and returns this object for subsequent steps. The modifications also adjust the subsequent check to base its logic on the count of author keys instead of commit count.

Changes

File Path Summary
.github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml Added error handling for empty commit arrays, extracted unique commit authors into an object, and updated subsequent checks to verify author presence before processing co-authored messages.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant W as Workflow
    participant C as Commits List
    participant A as Authors Extraction

    W->>C: Retrieve commits from PR
    alt No commits
        C-->>W: Empty list
        W->>W: Set failure "No commits found"
    else Commits exist
        C-->>W: Non-empty list
        W->>A: Extract unique authors (username, name, email)
        A-->>W: Return authors object
        alt No authors
            W->>W: Set failure "No authors found"
        else Authors found
            W->>W: Proceed with co-authored message logic
        end
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge, autoupdate

Suggested reviewers

  • magicmatatjahu
  • devilkiller-ag
  • akshatnema
  • sambhavgupta0705
  • anshgoyalevil
  • asyncapi-bot-eve
  • Mayaleeeee
  • derberg

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a coding flair,
Hopping in workflows without a care.
Commits and authors now in sight,
Logic shines through day and night.
Carrots and fixes, our future's bright!
🥕🐇

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f0d5a27
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67d98b242d1a830008d30d18
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3917--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (7eddd48) to head (f0d5a27).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3917   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          667       667           
  Branches       113       113           
=========================================
  Hits           667       667           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml (1)

98-98: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Review JSON Parsing of Commit Message

The merge commit message is constructed using fromJSON(steps.create-commit-message.outputs.result), yet the commit message step returns a plain string (the co-author lines). If this string isn’t valid JSON, the conversion will fail. Verify whether the output should be a JSON-encoded value or adjust the usage by removing the fromJSON conversion if it’s unnecessary.


Below is a shell script to gather context from the workflow file regarding the definition of the create-commit-message step. This will help verify whether its output (steps.create-commit-message.outputs.result) is produced as a JSON string or as plain text.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Display context around the "create-commit-message" step in the workflow file.
rg -C 5 "id:\s*create-commit-message" .github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml

Length of output: 384


Below is a shell script to search for additional output handling around the create-commit-message step. This will help determine whether its output is a JSON-encoded string or plain text.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any reference to JSON.stringify or similar constructs in the vicinity of the "create-commit-message" step.
rg -C 10 "create-commit-message" .github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml

Length of output: 1572


Merge Commit Message JSON Parsing Mismatch

The current workflow expects a JSON-encoded string via fromJSON(steps.create-commit-message.outputs.result), but the "Create commit message" step returns a plain string (the co-author lines) without JSON encoding. This mismatch can lead to a conversion failure during the merge process. Please either update the commit message step to return JSON.stringify(coAuthors) (ensuring the output is valid JSON) or remove the fromJSON conversion within the MERGE_COMMIT_MESSAGE setting.

  • File: .github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml (Line 98)
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml (3)

43-62: Enhanced Commit Processing and Author Extraction Logic

The updated code now correctly checks for an empty commits list and extracts unique authors from the commits. However, when no commits are found, the script returns an empty string (''), whereas a valid author mapping is expected later. For consistent behavior and type safety, consider returning an empty object ({}) instead.


73-78: Ensure Consistent ‘authors’ Output Type

In this step the code uses Object.keys(authors).length to verify the presence of authors. This check assumes that the output from the previous step is always an object. If an empty string is returned (as in the error case above), the behavior of Object.keys could be unexpected. Standardize the output so that it always returns an object (even if empty) to avoid potential type issues.


86-86: Remove Redundant Semicolon

The debug statement at line 86 contains an extra semicolon (core.debug(coAuthors);;). Removing the redundant semicolon will help keep the code clean and adhere to best practices.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7eddd48 and f0d5a27.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/automerge-for-humans-merging.yml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 18, 2025

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit 9595c0f into asyncapi:master Mar 18, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants