Skip to content

Conversation

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Refreshed the visual presentation of language tags, including a new color scheme for Scala.
  • New Features

    • Revamped the tools directory with updated names, descriptions, and technology details.
    • Introduced new templates for Node.js Websockets, Java Spring, Java Spring Cloud Streams, and HTML to enhance usability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR updates two configuration files. In config/all-tags.json, the color values for the Scala language tag are changed and several technology entries have been duplicated. In config/tools-automated.json, tool definitions are reorganized: tool names, descriptions, links, technology stacks, and categories have been updated alongside the addition of new templates.

Changes

File Change Summary
config/all-tags.json Updated Scala tag colors (from bg-[#FFA299]/border-[#DF301F] to bg-[#57f281]/border-[#37f069]); added duplicate entries for multiple technologies.
config/tools-automated.json Renamed and restructured tool definitions; updated titles, descriptions, links, tech stacks, and categories; added new tools and generator templates.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

autoapproved, autoupdate

Suggested reviewers

  • derberg
  • akshatnema
  • magicmatatjahu
  • sambhavgupta0705
  • anshgoyalevil
  • Mayaleeeee
  • devilkiller-ag
  • asyncapi-bot-eve

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping through the code,
Finding colors that now brightly explode.
Scala shines in a dazzling new light,
And tools are reformed for a smoother flight.
Carrots & code, a blend so neat—
A joyful leap with every updated beat!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1ef379b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67ce3297665d180008a13425
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3857--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (73b8496) to head (1ef379b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3857   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          667       667           
  Branches       113       113           
=========================================
  Hits           667       667           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit 8612ccc into master Mar 10, 2025
32 of 34 checks passed
@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot deleted the update-tools/regenerateTools branch March 10, 2025 00:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
config/tools-automated.json (1)

1-1709: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Pervasive Duplicate Tool Entries Across Categories
A review of the file reveals that nearly every category (e.g., APIs, Code-first tools, Code Generators, Converters, Editors, CLI, Bundlers, IDE Extensions, AsyncAPI Generator Templates, and Others) contains duplicated tool definitions. For example, the "AsyncAPI Server API", "nestjs-asyncapi", "AsyncAPI Modelina", "Specmatic", and "AsyncAPI CLI" tools all appear more than once with identical properties. Please double-check whether this widespread duplication is an intended outcome of the automation or if it should be consolidated to avoid redundancy and potential processing or display issues.


Action Required: Consolidate Duplicate Tool Entries

After reviewing the provided JSON snippet, it’s clear that many tool definitions appear multiple times across categories. For instance:

  • In the APIs category, the "AsyncAPI Server API" tool is listed twice with identical properties.
  • In Code-first tools, the "nestjs-asyncapi" tool is duplicated.
  • This pattern repeats with tools like "AsyncAPI Modelina", "Specmatic", "AsyncAPI CLI", and others across several sections.

Please verify whether these duplicates are an intentional outcome of the automation process. If not, consider refactoring the file to consolidate duplicate definitions to avoid redundancy, potential processing issues, and display inconsistencies.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
config/all-tags.json (1)

18-77: Duplicate Technology Entries Detected
Within the "technologies" array, there are multiple duplicate entries (for example, repeated entries for "Scala", "TypeScript", "Socket.IO", "AsyncAPI Generator", etc.). This redundancy might affect how the technologies are displayed or processed. Please confirm if these duplicates are intentional; if not, consider consolidating them to eliminate potential confusion or unnecessary processing overhead.

config/tools-automated.json (1)

1410-1471: Inconsistent Language Setting for Java-Based Templates
In the AsyncAPI Generator Templates section, entries such as "Java Spring Template", "Java Spring Cloud Stream Template", and "Java Template" specify the language as an array containing "javascript". Given that these templates are Java‑based, it appears there may be a misconfiguration in the language field. Please review and update the language key as appropriate (e.g. "Java") to ensure consistency with the expected taxonomy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73b8496 and 1ef379b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/all-tags.json (1 hunks)
  • config/tools-automated.json (9 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
  • GitHub Check: Automerge PR autoapproved by a bot
  • GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI
🔇 Additional comments (1)
config/all-tags.json (1)

13-17: Scala Language Tag Color Update
The Scala language entry now uses the new color (bg-[#57f281]) and border color (border-[#37f069]). Please verify with the design guidelines or style guide to ensure that these new values are consistent with the overall visual theme.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants