Skip to content

Strict types #117

@kelunik

Description

@kelunik

Yes, who ever thought it was a good idea to introduce yet another behavior that might be toggled... we have to deal with strict types in the spec. We have to define whether loop implementations MUST or MUST NOT use strict typing. They call a lot of callbacks and thus implementations shouldn't differ there. Unfortunately, the callbacks are subject to the caller file's declaration, so the loop driver one.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions