Skip to content

Use codecov instead of coveralls #17

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018
Merged

Use codecov instead of coveralls #17

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

astrofrog
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@6c8bec9). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #17   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   83.43%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        2           
  Lines             ?      163           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      136           
  Misses            ?       27           
  Partials          ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pytest_arraydiff/plugin.py 83.33% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6c8bec9...d95e26a. Read the comment docs.

@astrofrog astrofrog merged commit ca747f3 into master Dec 5, 2018
@astrofrog astrofrog deleted the codecov branch March 10, 2021 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant