Skip to content

Conversation

@ntBre
Copy link
Contributor

@ntBre ntBre commented Nov 6, 2025

Summary

This PR adds a new section to CONTRIBUTING.md describing the expected contents of the PR summary and test plan, using the ecosystem report, and communicating the status of a PR.

This seemed like a pretty good place to insert this in the document, at the end of the advice on preparing actual code changes, but I'm certainly open to other suggestions about both the content and placement.

Test Plan

Future PRs :)

Summary
--

This PR adds a new section to CONTRIBUTING.md describing the expected contents
of the PR summary and test plan, using the ecosystem report, and communicating
the status of a PR.

This seemed like a pretty good place to insert this in the document, at the end
of the advice on preparing actual code changes, but I'm certainly open to other
suggestions about both the content and placement.

Test Plan
--

Future PRs :)
@ntBre ntBre added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 6, 2025
@ntBre ntBre requested review from MichaReiser and amyreese November 6, 2025 16:07
Comment on lines +296 to +300
We don't currently have any rules around AI usage or disclosure, but remember
that this PR summary will be our first impression of your PR. The higher its
quality and accuracy, the more easily we can start reviewing your PR. However
you generate the contents of this summary, please ensure that it corresponds to
the code and doesn't include extraneous or misleading information.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be worth adding something around keeping things brief of "succinct" as a way to discourage long or overly-fluffed summaries?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think that's a good idea. I'll think more about how to work it in.

Copy link
Member

@MichaReiser MichaReiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this. This is great. I've a few smaller suggestions around pharsing.

Comment on lines +296 to +298
We don't currently have any rules around AI usage or disclosure, but remember
that this PR summary will be our first impression of your PR. The higher its
quality and accuracy, the more easily we can start reviewing your PR. However
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sounds a bit intimidating (even when not using AI). I think I'd frame it around AI being useful, but a successful AI generated contribution is reviewed and the summary is editoralized before submitting the PR.

Comment on lines +315 to +316
You should fill in the sections above before opening your PR. After opening the
PR, an ecosystem report will be run as part of CI. This shows a diff of linter
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
You should fill in the sections above before opening your PR. After opening the
PR, an ecosystem report will be run as part of CI. This shows a diff of linter
After opening the PR, an ecosystem report will be run as part of CI. This shows a diff of linter

I'd omit this sentence. It's sort of implied by the previous sections

Comment on lines +318 to +319
differences are reported, you should go through them and make sure they look
correct. After going through the results of the ecosystem check, you should
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than making this mandatory, I'd formalize this more around how them review and discussing the ecosystem changes helps us being more effective at reviewing their PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants