Skip to content

Conversation

@MichaReiser
Copy link
Member

@MichaReiser MichaReiser commented Dec 2, 2024

Summary

Reverts #14615 due to #14698

The fix-bug seems worse than avoiding the few false positives. That's why I think we should revert this change
for now to give us more time to work on proper @no_type_check support.

Fixes #14698

Copy link
Member

@charliermarsh charliermarsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. The PR itself was solid but it was my mistake to take this approach.

@MichaReiser MichaReiser merged commit f96dfc1 into main Dec 2, 2024
21 checks passed
@MichaReiser MichaReiser deleted the micha/revert-no-type-check branch December 2, 2024 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

regression: ruff deletes imports; successive checks fail due to missing import

4 participants