[pyupgrade] Mark UP008 fix safe if no comments in range (#18683)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary
Mark `UP008`'s fix safe if it won't delete comments.

## Relevant Issues
Fixes: #18533

---------

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: robsdedude

crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP008.py

@@ -105,3 +105,23 @@ def f(self):
 class C:
     def f(self):
         builtins.super(C, self)
+
+
+# see: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18533
+class ClassForCommentEnthusiasts(BaseClass):
+    def with_comments(self):
+        super(
+            # super helpful comment
+            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+            self
+        ).f()
+        super(
+            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+            # even more helpful comment
+            self
+        ).f()
+        super(
+            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+            self
+            # also a comment
+        ).f()

crates/ruff_linter/src/preview.rs

@@ -104,3 +104,10 @@ pub(crate) const fn is_invalid_async_mock_access_check_enabled(settings: &Linter
 pub(crate) const fn is_raise_exception_byte_string_enabled(settings: &LinterSettings) -> bool {
     settings.preview.is_enabled()
 }
+
+// https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18683
+pub(crate) const fn is_safe_super_call_with_parameters_fix_enabled(
+    settings: &LinterSettings,
+) -> bool {
+    settings.preview.is_enabled()
+}

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pyupgrade/mod.rs

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ mod tests {
 
     use crate::registry::Rule;
     use crate::rules::pyupgrade;
-
+    use crate::settings::types::PreviewMode;
     use crate::test::test_path;
     use crate::{assert_diagnostics, settings};
 
@@ -122,6 +122,20 @@ mod tests {
         Ok(())
     }
 
+    #[test_case(Rule::SuperCallWithParameters, Path::new("UP008.py"))]
+    fn rules_preview(rule_code: Rule, path: &Path) -> Result<()> {
+        let snapshot = format!("{}__preview", path.to_string_lossy());
+        let diagnostics = test_path(
+            Path::new("pyupgrade").join(path).as_path(),
+            &settings::LinterSettings {
+                preview: PreviewMode::Enabled,
+                ..settings::LinterSettings::for_rule(rule_code)
+            },
+        )?;
+        assert_diagnostics!(snapshot, diagnostics);
+        Ok(())
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn async_timeout_error_alias_not_applied_py310() -> Result<()> {
         let diagnostics = test_path(

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pyupgrade/rules/super_call_with_parameters.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
+use ruff_diagnostics::Applicability;
 use ruff_macros::{ViolationMetadata, derive_message_formats};
 use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr, Stmt};
 use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextSize};
 
 use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
+use crate::preview::is_safe_super_call_with_parameters_fix_enabled;
 use crate::{AlwaysFixableViolation, Edit, Fix};
 
 /// ## What it does
@@ -45,6 +47,10 @@ use crate::{AlwaysFixableViolation, Edit, Fix};
 /// This rule's fix is marked as unsafe because removing the arguments from a call
 /// may delete comments that are attached to the arguments.
 ///
+/// In [preview], the fix is marked safe if no comments are present.
+///
+/// [preview]: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/preview/
+///
 /// ## References
 /// - [Python documentation: `super`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#super)
 /// - [super/MRO, Python's most misunderstood feature.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1PQ7zzltz4)
@@ -159,11 +165,22 @@ pub(crate) fn super_call_with_parameters(checker: &Checker, call: &ast::ExprCall
         return;
     }
 
+    let applicability = if !checker.comment_ranges().intersects(call.arguments.range())
+        && is_safe_super_call_with_parameters_fix_enabled(checker.settings())
+    {
+        Applicability::Safe
+    } else {
+        Applicability::Unsafe
+    };
+
     let mut diagnostic = checker.report_diagnostic(SuperCallWithParameters, call.arguments.range());
-    diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::unsafe_edit(Edit::deletion(
-        call.arguments.start() + TextSize::new(1),
-        call.arguments.end() - TextSize::new(1),
-    )));
+    diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::applicable_edit(
+        Edit::deletion(
+            call.arguments.start() + TextSize::new(1),
+            call.arguments.end() - TextSize::new(1),
+        ),
+        applicability,
+    ));
 }
 
 /// Returns `true` if a call is an argumented `super` invocation.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pyupgrade/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__pyupgrade__tests__UP008.py.snap

@@ -161,3 +161,91 @@ UP008.py:107:23: UP008 [*] Use `super()` instead of `super(__class__, self)`
 106 106 |     def f(self):
 107     |-        builtins.super(C, self)
     107 |+        builtins.super()
+108 108 | 
+109 109 | 
+110 110 | # see: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18533
+
+UP008.py:113:14: UP008 [*] Use `super()` instead of `super(__class__, self)`
+    |
+111 |   class ClassForCommentEnthusiasts(BaseClass):
+112 |       def with_comments(self):
+113 |           super(
+    |  ______________^
+114 | |             # super helpful comment
+115 | |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+116 | |             self
+117 | |         ).f()
+    | |_________^ UP008
+118 |           super(
+119 |               ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+    |
+    = help: Remove `super()` parameters
+
+ℹ Unsafe fix
+110 110 | # see: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18533
+111 111 | class ClassForCommentEnthusiasts(BaseClass):
+112 112 |     def with_comments(self):
+113     |-        super(
+114     |-            # super helpful comment
+115     |-            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+116     |-            self
+117     |-        ).f()
+    113 |+        super().f()
+118 114 |         super(
+119 115 |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+120 116 |             # even more helpful comment
+
+UP008.py:118:14: UP008 [*] Use `super()` instead of `super(__class__, self)`
+    |
+116 |               self
+117 |           ).f()
+118 |           super(
+    |  ______________^
+119 | |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+120 | |             # even more helpful comment
+121 | |             self
+122 | |         ).f()
+    | |_________^ UP008
+123 |           super(
+124 |               ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+    |
+    = help: Remove `super()` parameters
+
+ℹ Unsafe fix
+115 115 |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+116 116 |             self
+117 117 |         ).f()
+118     |-        super(
+119     |-            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+120     |-            # even more helpful comment
+121     |-            self
+122     |-        ).f()
+    118 |+        super().f()
+123 119 |         super(
+124 120 |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+125 121 |             self
+
+UP008.py:123:14: UP008 [*] Use `super()` instead of `super(__class__, self)`
+    |
+121 |               self
+122 |           ).f()
+123 |           super(
+    |  ______________^
+124 | |             ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+125 | |             self
+126 | |             # also a comment
+127 | |         ).f()
+    | |_________^ UP008
+    |
+    = help: Remove `super()` parameters
+
+ℹ Unsafe fix
+120 120 |             # even more helpful comment
+121 121 |             self
+122 122 |         ).f()
+123     |-        super(
+124     |-            ClassForCommentEnthusiasts,
+125     |-            self
+126     |-            # also a comment
+127     |-        ).f()
+    123 |+        super().f()